Maori charges 2016

http://www.ilmessaggero.it/primopiano/cronaca/raffaele_sollecito_avvocato_sospeso-1697425.html

Banned for four months from the profession because it accused of aiding and abetting against his client is accused questioned by the prosecutor of Perugia, and implemented by the investigating magistrate who issued the measure, the lawyer Luca Maori and a colleague who had joined him the proceedings.

Charging that the law - known for having defended, among others, Raffaele Sollecito in the trial for the murder of Meredith Kercher (ended with the final acquittal of the young Amanda Knox) “‹”‹- dismissed today during a long interrogation guarantee before the same magistrate. Claiming it acted correctly defensive. The case against the lawyer Maori concerns in particular a DNA test done on the run son, six years old, his client, who was arrested for killing his wife with a gun after a quarrel at home.

This to try before the review (which then confirmed the prison for the man, criticizing the test run) that it was a crime of impulse related to a victim’s sentence. The prosecutor in Perugia has, however, disputed the manner and time in which it was made the examination of the genetic code of the child. For the Maori lawyer and his colleague he had asked the prosecutor in Perugia house arrest for aiding and false ideology (also challenged the legal advisor who was not taken any action) but the judge for preliminary investigations ruled quest ’ last offense by placing the disqualification, for four months, instead of custody. Maori responded this afternoon for about two hours to the questions of the investigating judge and the prosecutor.

At the end of the interrogation, his lawyer, the lawyer Francesco Falcinelli, called for the lifting of the disqualification and the judge reserved his decision. “The attorney Maori reconstructed in detail all facts of interest for the investigation,” said the lawyer Falcinelli without however going into the merits of the interrogation. “He represented - he added - that his was a legitimate articulation of the defensive perimeter of the mandate received.” For the lawyer Falcinelli the crime of aiding the disputed legal ‘does not exist. “

Posted by Peter Quennell on 07/21/17 at 03:55 AM in

Tweet This Post

Tweet

Comments

No comments yet. Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Where next:

Click here to return to The Top Of The Front Page

Or to next entry Cassation re 530 & 628

Or to previous entry Nick van der Leek