Correcting Netflix 5 Omitted - Blackhurst Now Nervous Of Legal Risks For Doing Mafias’ Dirty Work?



Netflix Director Rod Blackhurst has worked for Knox PR since 2010

1. How Blackhurst Went Wrong

First, see above. Blackhurst’s pro-Knox fanaticism goes back seven years THAT is sure not explained in the film.

Second, see the image of Blackhurt’s bizarre tweet at bottom, conceivably welcoming our expose of his huge hoax. A minor development which could come to signify more.

The REAL story here is not the framing of Knox or a justice system that doesnt play fair. It is instead the giant innocence fraud perpetrated by Curt Knox and David Marriott since late 2007, and the known mafia manipulation to spring RS and AK and to bring Italian justice down a peg.

The aggressive PR scheme is not even mentioned at all, though it put out and took in millions of dollars. It has promoted anti-Italy fanaticism to the extent that several dupes have screamed at public events in Perugia and cops have been told to be wary of Americans who might tote guns.

Check out the 30 hoaxes in our right column hatched by the PR which we will expand upon in coming weeks. Many are furthered by this hapless film.

2. How Blackhurst Might Get Things Right

Blackhurst could start setting things right by starting way back when. That well-documented childhood abuse (touched on also in Knox’s book) could explain why so many have found Amanda Knox erratic and hard to take.

Not the least of those of course is Sollecito, who on and off  since 2007 has railed at her.

Meredith and her other flatmates and her cellmates in prison and pretty well anyone she ever met in Perugia found her hard to take, though when she was not high on drugs she did seem now and then to be trying to act right.

Why did Curt Knox initiate take-no-prisoners PR in a heartbeat in 2007? To cover his own tail for damage he had done to her in childhood, provoking a crazed escalation resulting in Meredith’s death? And why did so few in Seattle speak up for Amanda Knox in 2007? Why were so few parents keen to see an award created in her name at her high school?

Let’s hope Blackhurst is capable of real work and not simply parroting the PR..


Posted by Our Main Posters on 09/22/16 at 09:05 AM in News media & movies,  Movies on case,  Hoaxers from 2007,  Knox-Marriott PR,  More hoaxers,  Hoaxers: media groups,  The Netflix hoax

Tweet This Post


Comments

I hardly think you can say that Blackhurst is jumping ship based on him liking a TJMK tweet. He’s liked one of my tweets too. IMO

Posted by jhansigirl on 09/22/16 at 04:00 PM | #

The title was semi-serious and in 8 years we never ever had anyone point to something not in their interests.

He’s not just reading our tweet, and I doubt he is “liking” very many of the others.

Theres a remarkable number of really informed negative tweets already about the flick, and almost none now in favor.

His back is against the wall and this will start getting to him.

A main point of the post is to get him to understand a vital key to the situation, and see a face-saving way forward.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 09/22/16 at 04:11 PM | #

Okay, good luck with that one!

The problem of course is that the two directors are essentially clueless. Absolutely out of their depth on a complex case, and winging it.

Andrea Vogt and Paul Russell made a GOOD report for the BBC. That was really compelling state of the art stuff.

Terrified, Curt Knox and David Marriott threatened and threatened, and so no US network accepted to buy and air it.

Instead we get this absurd and vacuous alternative, with the fanatical Knox-Marriott flunky Stephen Robert Morse dishonestly manipulating it. 

I would HOPE Rod Blackhurst could make a serious attempt to uncover all the stories waiting in Seattle, though he would need to be dogged and fearless.

But for the Netflix movie, the directors merely sat people in front of a camera, and hoped to obtain something meaningful.

They claimed this was fresh and different and insightful.

Really???

Knox had a million dollar campaign rehearsing her. She had the directors wrapped around her little finger.

There are 500 open questions for Knox on this site, and 500 evidence points, and 1000 examples of her lying, and 100 examples of her defaming..

How many were addressed to her? Approximately zero.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 09/22/16 at 09:16 PM | #
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Where next:

Click here to return to The Top Of The Front Page

Or to next entry Correcting Netflix 6: Omitted - The Almost Unique Carefulness Of Italy’s Justice System

Or to previous entry Correcting Netflix 4: Omitted - Netflix Illegally Demonizes Dr Mignini To The Advantage Of The Mafias