TJMK http:/truejustice.org/ee/index.php en editor@truejustice.com Copyright 2014 2014-05-12T01:30:00+00:00 Nailing In Advance Amanda Knox’s Expected Lie-A-Thon At 10 April Appeal #1 https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/nailing_in_advance_amanda_knoxs_expected_lie_a_thon_at_10_april_appeal_1 https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/nailing_in_advance_amanda_knoxs_expected_lie_a_thon_at_10_april_appeal_1#When:19:05:00Z {summary} Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2024-02-14T19:05:00+00:00 Meredith & Some Of Her Many Friends At This Time Of Year https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/meredith_some_of_her_many_friends_at_this_time_of_year https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/meredith_some_of_her_many_friends_at_this_time_of_year#When:03:00:00Z {summary} Happy Christmas, Everyone Meredith’s family and friends especially. Meredith’s next birthday would have been this Thursday. Those of her friends in touch with us still regard it as a solemn what-might-have-been day. We wish them all well. News on the case in 2024 is likely to be pretty explosive. Do take a look at Meredith’s childhood neighborhood before her family moved to the south edge of London. Click for Post:  Meredith’s London #1: Her Connection With This, The Coolest Part Of Town? Click for Post:  Meredith’s London #2: More On Where She Came From, And Probably Had Some Fun Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-12-25T03:00:00+00:00 Twenty Ways To Smarten Up American Police Systems https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/twenty_ways_to_smarten_up_american_police_systems https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/twenty_ways_to_smarten_up_american_police_systems#When:18:24:00Z {summary} Uploaded a year ago; 600,000 views now 1. Wider Context Again and again we see US police in serious shortfall, in major part because of this globally unique arrangement. There are about 18,000 state and local police agencies in the US. These generally fall into the following categories: state police, county police, county sheriffs, municipal police, and special district police. Resultant problems? Generally low pay, difficulty in recruitment and retention, on-average poor training, amateurish elected or politically-appointed leadership, huge problems in nation-wide modernizing, and almost complete absence of learning from other countries.  Cops shoot hundreds annually, and are very widely mistrusted. Gun ownership is incessantly on the rise in part because of this situation. 2. Uvalde Texas Case There is ONE important bright-spot development; the growing torrent of recordings from the huge array of cellphones and CCTVs and police bodycams and police-car-windscreen cams. The Uvalde case highlights that. Eighteen months ago, nineteen elementary-school children and two adults were killed by yet another heavily armed mass murderer. The lack of preparedness at the school and the (frankly cowardly and uncaring) local law-enforcement response have been enormously criticized. It will take years for full correction and the planned building of a (vastly enhanced) new elementary school. At bottom is a 53-minutes Frontline analysis of thousands of hours of bodycam and other recorded evidence by the American Public Broadcasting Service. Highly worth reading is this 20-point online analysis by highly regarded police trainer Lt Dan Marcou. In summary: 1. Believe it can happen! One officer shared, “None of us ever thought the situation would happen here.” 2. Train realistically, regularly and together! 3. Communication is a critical component of tactical success. 4. Immediately move toward the threat, identify the threat and stop the threat! 5. Manage your fear. 6. An active shooter in a room with victims and potential victims is an immediate emergency. 7. An inner perimeter should contain only the problem and the solution to the problem. 8. The first rule in breaching is to check to see if the door is unlocked! 9. You can’t wait for ballistic shields to be brought to the scene during an active killing in progress. 10. If you have no distractive device, improvise. 11. Know the layout in advance. 12. Someone needs to take command immediately. 13. For large events establish a command post and learn to use the incident command model. 14. If you can’t solve the problem don’t impede someone who can. 15. If you are not the cavalry, step aside when the cavalry arrives. 16. Pre-practice room entries/clearing even if you are not SWAT. 17. Shoot accurately under stress. 18. There should be a staging area. 19. Realize that once the threat is over, there is an incredible amount of work to be done, such as [examples]. 20. Realize everyone processes incidents like this differently. Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-12-15T18:24:00+00:00 American Woman Kills In Jealous Rage… Does This Ring A Bell? https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/american_woman_kills_in_jealous_rage.._does_this_ring_a_bell https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/american_woman_kills_in_jealous_rage.._does_this_ring_a_bell#When:14:12:00Z {summary} Overview Above, Kaitlin Armstrong is sentenced to ninety years. She raged Knox-style at Moriah Wilson over a man, shot her three times, and went on the lam. She was extradited from Costa Rica (see saga discussed below) where she was halfway to assuming a full disguise. Now she pays, and pays. Rightfully. No bent courts here.   Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-11-19T14:12:00+00:00 Maine US Mass Shooting: Awesome Systems Brought Into Play - After A Major Systems Failure https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/maine_us_mass_shooting_awesome_systems_brought_into_play https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/maine_us_mass_shooting_awesome_systems_brought_into_play#When:14:11:00Z {summary} Overview The impressive briefing above took place in Maine last Saturday. Well above par for such things. The body of a mentally-disturbed killer of 18, a highly trained ex-military marksman, had just been discovered inside the trailer of an 18-wheeler overlooked in the first search of a likely area. He had a gunshot wound to the head - from a military style weapon designed to quickly kill many people in combat. The lead briefer is the Maine equivalent of the head of a national public-safety entity like Scotland Yard or the Carabinieri or FBI. Exceptional here is his vivid description of just how many seemingly excellent systems were brought into play after the fact. One can readily list 3 or 4 dozen. However… In fact the mass shooting had been easily preventable. Previously he had VOLUNTARILY committed himself to a psychological facility, but after only a few days he was released without further monitoring. And his family had WARNED the police about him. See Monday’s headlines:  Click for Post:  Maine gunman spoke ‘aggressively’ of guns, former co-workers say, as more warning signs emerge Click for Post:  Maine shooter’s family warned cops he was armed and dangerous FIVE MONTHS before massacre Click for Post:  Suspect’s family warned police months before massacre Click for Post:  Cops Warned of Maine Shooting Suspect’s Declining Mental Health in May Click for Post:  Cops were sent to Maine gunman’s home weeks before massacres amid concern he ‘is going to snap and commit a mass shooting’ Click for Post:  Maine gunman’s family contacted police months before massacre, sheriff says Yet again the US’s plague of thousands of way-too-often under-funded, badly-trained, badly-managed, badly-connected local police forces is causing outrage. Contrast with eg Italy. Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-10-31T14:11:00+00:00 Explaining The New Attempt To Annul Knox’s Calunnia Conviction & ECHR’s Role https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/explaining_the_new_attempt_to_annul https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/explaining_the_new_attempt_to_annul#When:19:01:00Z {summary} Florence court where decision will be made 1. The History Knox has provisionally won a Supreme Court appeal against her 2009 calunnia conviction for framing Patrick. A Florence court will now check the facts and rule whether she did win. It is worth looking back to see on what grounds Knox had a limited victory at the ECHR in Strasbourg which gave its findings in January 2019, and in which Italy unsuccessfully appealed against. Back in 2008, the European Court of Human Rights issued a groundbreaking decision in the case of Salduz v. Turkey. The court held that people detained at police stations have the right to access a lawyer. If people are interrogated by the police without getting the benefit of legal assistance, this could be a violation of their fundamental right to a fair trial.  It is on this point that Knox succeeded. But we can readily see that (a) Knox was not being detained at a police station when she made her false allegations against Lumumba, she arrived of her own volition, and (b) as of that point she was not a suspect, ergo nor was she scheduled for an interrogation.  As soon as Knox accused Patrick Lumumba of being the rapist/killer of Meredith, the interview was terminated. So where did the ECHR get the idea Knox had been ‘interrogated’?  From the fact of Knox’s defence lawyer, Carlo Dalla Vedova’s submissions to the ECHR, relying heavily on the Motivational Reports of Boninsegna, 2016, and Hellmann-Zanetti, 2011.  Problem is, Boninsegna was not the judge in Knox’s callunia conviction case; that was Massei, 2009.  Massei was largely ‘overturned’ by 2011 Appeal Judges Hellmann-Zanetti, who in turn was largely annulled by the 2013 Chieffi Supreme Court, and the Knox-Sollecito first apeal was reverted back to the 2014 Appeal Court Nencini, 2014, in a different legal region (Tuscany). Judge Hellmann nonetheless upheld Knox’s Calunnia conviction, as did final Supreme Court Bruno-Marasca. Thus, the Calunnia conviction was never at any stage rescinded or referred back on appeal.  But it was Judge Hellmann who introduced the concept of ‘interrogation’ and Judge Boninsegna, who oversaw the second Calunnia trial, this time relating to a different charge of slander, against the police, and which was thrown out, relied heavily on Hellmann’s descriptive narrative of an ‘interrogation’. Yet Knox was not in custody and was there only as a person of interest.  She volunteered to hang around, having arrived at the Questura with her then boyfriend, Sollecito, who had been summonsed by the police to attend.  Thus, volunteering information is not technically an ‘interrogation’ in the legal sense. The ECHR upholding Knox’s claim under Article 6, right to a fair hearing: •relied on comments by Hellmann Appeal Court, which was largely superseded and replaced by the Chieffi Supreme Court. •relied heavily on police minutes and the fact, it says via Boninsegna, that an interpreter, Doninno, and a police officer, RI, failed to record details of their expressions of familiarity with Knox, or make a note that (i) Knox was asked if she wanted a lawyer and declined, (ii) that start and end times are not recorded, and that (iii) hours are condensed into minutes. These police minutes represented a failure of procedure, the ECHR reasoned.  But if Knox was not technically under police interrogation nor detained, that would explain the lack of ‘start’ and ‘finish’ times and obviate the need to read the informant their rights. 2. The Evidence So what is the evidence of Knox falsely, of her own free will, accusing Patrick Lumumba of raping and killing Meredith? According to Prosecutor Mignini in his recent book, the facts are these: When Amanda receives that message in her mobile phone 3484673590, precisely at 20.18.12 […]  the users were “hooked” to the cell “Via dell’Aquila n. 5 - Torre dell’Acquedotto sector 3” […]. Amanda replies to Patrick at 8.32.34 p.m., with the SMS message whose screen Lumumba recognized […]. Amanda writes: “Of course. See you later. Good evening!”, in Italian but which was thought by Amanda in English as equivalent to “see you later”, an equivalent of “See you later” or “to resent”, indicating an indeterminate future, next meeting, just of people who see themselves regularly. That evening, in fact, there was no work. Amanda and Patrick had no appointments whatsoever […]. When Amanda sends the SMS message in reply to Patrick, the reference cell, to which Knox’s users are “hooked”, is that of “Via Berar- di sector 7”, which gives coverage to Corso Garibaldi, where the Sollecito’s home is located.  This means that the girl from Seattle, as it was said, had gone out […] from where she was returning to the Sollecito’s house when she received Patrick’s SMS. It is quite likely that Amanda returned from Sollecito at about 20.30, after getting off via Ulisse Rocchi or passing through Piazza Cavallotti, where she received Patrick’s SMS. […]on the night between Monday and Tuesday, that is between 5 and 6, is the centre piece of the trial, […] because the most important event of that week was precisely the false accusation made by Amanda Knox against her employer, Patrick Diya Lumumba, owner of the Pub “Le Chic”, in the historic centre of the city. This slander, repeated on several occasions in the hours and days after, and which would be completely unexplained if Amanda had not at least been present at the crime, played a fundamental role in the judgment of responsibility against Knox and constitutes, so to speak, the painful point against which Amanda defended herself, […]  in front of the policemen to whom she accused Patrick and to me who, however, arrived at the police station later. I would stress that, for the offense of slander against Patrick, Knox has been definitively convicted, so that she can no longer claim invoked pressure from the investigators, which made her falsely accuse Lumumba. This crime was committed with full conscience and self-determination by Amanda, who is the only author of it and who, for this reason, was sentenced to an exemplary sentence.” There is also the issue of the police wiretap which caught Knox confessing to her mother in the following week of knowing that Patrick was in prison wrongfully, but neither informed the police to rectify the situation. Mignini further explains in his book that Knox said in her statement to the police that she lied to Sollecito that she had to go to work that evening: ...that, therefore, she had gone out and met Patrick in the nearby basketball field, and that she had then returned with him to the apartment of Via della Pergola. There, again according to Knox’s account, Lumumba would have secluded himself in Meredith’s chamber with her, had sexual intercourse with her, then degenerately killed her. Amanda would have heard everything from the position where she had stayed. It’s evident that she must have heard screams, fuss and then cries of Meredith before she was killed.’ […]… and, therefore, the need to hide from Raffaele the encounter with Patrick (or, perhaps, with the other black, hidden under the guise of Lumumba, that is Rudi Hermann Guede), the next story may have a more or less innocent side, in the sense that Amanda would have only wanted to make Lumumba meet with her British roommate, but also, on the contrary, a disturbing side, alluding to a real participation of the girl from Seattle in the violence suffered by Mez and in her killing at the hands of Lumumba, having knowingly allowed him to meet Meredith in the apartment. However, Amanda accused Lumumba, not herself. They were statements that were “straight incrimination of another party”, not “self incrimination”. This is an important distinction.  One has the right in law not to incriminate oneself but no-one has the right to falsely accuse another of a crime that leads directly to their detriment.  Lumumba was arrested in the early hours, in front of his wife and children, wearing nothing but underpants, and thrown into jail accused of a particularly heinous rape and murder, as a terrified African man from the Congo.  The photograph of his arrest appeared in the worldwide press. 2. The Court Judgments Then of course, there is the finding of the Supreme Court, Marasca & Bruno, Sept. 2015, who made it clear that Knox’s confirmed Calunnia conviction was borne out of a need to cover up for Rudi Guede, by virtue of his being also Black, as was Lumumba, and by reasoning that had a neighbour seen someone of that description near the cottage, that could be interchangeable with the person Knox had pointed a finger at, insofar that Marasca and Bruno upheld as a fact that Knox was present at the cottage when Meredith was murdered. “All this took place in Perugia, during the night between the 1st and 2nd of November 2007. Knox […], knowing that he was innocent, with statements filed during declaration to the Flying Squad and the Police of Perugia on the 6th of November 2007, she falsely blamed Diya Lumumba called “Patrick” for the murder of the young Meredith Kercher, all of this to obtain impunity for everyone and particularly for Guede Rudi Hermann, coloured as is Lumumba; in Perugia, during the night between the 5th and the 6th of November 2007. […] 4. Meanwhile, it can’t be ignored, on a first summary overview, that the history of these proceedings is characterized by a troubled and intrinsically contradictory path, with the only fact of irrefutable certainty being the guilt of Amanda Knox regarding the slanderous accusations against Patrick Lumumba. […] On the other hand, in the slanderous declarations against Lumumba, which earned her a conviction, the status of which is now protected as final judgement [giudicato], [they] had themselves exactly that premise in the narrative, that is: the presence of the young American woman inside the house in via della Pergola, a circumstance which nobody at that time – except obviously the other people present inside the house – could have known (quote p. 96). According to the slanderous statements of Ms. Knox, she had returned home in the company of Lumumba, who she had met by chance in Piazza Grimana, and when Ms. Kercher arrived in the house, Knox’s companion directed sexual attentions toward the young English woman, then he went together with her in her room, from which the harrowing scream came. So, it was Lumumba who killed Meredith and she could affirm this since she was on the scene of crime herself, albeit in another room.’ […] ‘Another element against her is certainly constituted by the false accusations [calunnia] against Mr. Lumumba, afore-mentioned above. It is not understandable, in fact, what reason could have driven the young woman to produce such serious accusations. The theory that she did so in order to escape psychological pressure from detectives seems extremely fragile, given that the woman [47] could not fail to realize that such accusations directed against her boss would turn out to be false very soon, given that, as she knew very well, Mr. Lumumba had no relationship with Ms. Kercher nor with the Via della Pergola house. Furthermore, the ability to present an ironclad alibi would have allowed Lumumba to obtain release and subsequently the dropping of charges. However, the said calunnia is another circumstantial element against the current appellant, insofar as it can be considered a strategy in order to cover up for Mr. Guede, whom she had an interest to protect because of fear of retaliatory accusations against her. This is confirmed by the fact that Mr. Lumumba, like Mr. Guede, is a man of colour, hence the indication of the first one would be safe in the event that the latter could have been seen by someone while entering or exiting the apartment.’ FIFTH CHAMBERS MOTIVATION REPORT (PRE-FINAL DATED 1 NOVEMBER 2015 For completeness of facts, here is what Massei, the trial court judge, had to say about Knox’ framing of Lumumba: “It must therefore be asserted that Amanda Knox freely accused Diya Lumumba of having killed Meredith, and so accused him with full knowledge of the innocence of the [419] same Lumumba. The incriminating evidence against Amanda Knox and her boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito which has been presented also highlights the goal that was thus pursued: to lead the investigators down the wrong track, far away from that which might have led to an investigation of her own and her boyfriend’s responsibility. A behaviour and a choice, therefore, [that were] purely defensive: Amanda had good relations with Lumumba, by whom she had always been treated well, as she herself stated, and thus there could have been no reason for rancour, animosity, revenge which could have justified such a serious accusation; the sole reason for unjustly accusing Lumumba was that of distancing herself and her boyfriend from every possibility of suspicion and the necessity of further investigations. To obtain this it was necessary to indicate a different perpetrator and so Amanda pointed to Diya Lumumba. A behaviour, therefore, which follows the same defence strategy as that already put into effect with the staging implemented by breaking the window of Romanelli’s room, and constitutes a further confirmation of Amanda Knox’s capacity for fictitious representations and contrived manipulation of the events. SENTENCE OF THE COURT OF ASSIZES OF PERUGIA 2009 (PRESIDED OVER BY DR. GIANCARLO MASSEI) 3. Conclusions So we can glean the following conclusions from this.  During the very earliest days of the course of investigation of Meredith’s murder, on the very next Tuesday evening after the Friday of 2 November, 2007, Knox pointed a finger at Lumumba knowing he was innocent and of her own free will, as found by all of the criminal courts.  The Italian criminal charge of Calunnia equates to the US charge of Obstruction of Justice or the UK equivalent of Perverting the Course of Justice, and is quite separate and distinct from any associated charge, such as the Aggravated Murder charge.  In the recent submission to the Court of Cassation, Knox relied heavily on the fact that the Aggravated Murder charge was annulled, and thus, ipso facto, was the argument that the Calunnia charge was also void.  However, the Court was not buying this and instead of the immediate annulment of the Calunnia conviction, a retrial has been set. Did Amanda Knox seek to derail the police investigation by pointing the detectives in the wrong direction of an innocent man, Patrick Lumumba? This is what will need to be determined once again. Why would Knox use the heavily criticised judgement of Hellmann - who found her guilty anyway - or that of third-party Judge Boninsegna who didn’t even deal with the Calunnia case against Lumumba, but who, to Dalla Vedova’s delight -ever the defence lawyer looking for a ‘get-out clause’ -  quoted Hellmann’s imprecise description of her voluntary police statements as an ‘interrogation’, when there were other, more completely, legitimate and more authoritative judgments that said otherwise, including the final Supreme Court Judge Marasca & Bruno of 2015.  Not forgetting that after she had signed her statement, she went away to her own private space and wrote a letter to the police underlining her belief she saw Patrick at the cottage, entirely unasked for and off her own free will.  Imagine the astonishment of the police officer when Amanda Knox crammed this letter into her hand, calling it ‘a present’. Far from being cowed or confused, it seems as though Amanda Knox was determined to direct the police to the wrong person.  As many people are unaware - especially in the USA - of Knox’s Calunnia conviction, this whole new retrial might be a shot in the foot for Knox as well as a waking up surprise for those who had no idea of this aspect of her involvement in the Meredith Kercher case nor of her true character. Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-10-14T19:01:00+00:00 Knox’s Misleading Petition To The Supreme Court https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/knoxs_misleading_petition_to_the_supreme_court https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/knoxs_misleading_petition_to_the_supreme_court#When:13:18:00Z {summary} Dalla Vedova also wrote untruthful Knox ECHR petition 1. Setting The Record Straight With reference to this MailOnline article and numerous Italian reports (see one translation below) on Knox’s attempt to have Italy quash her calunnia conviction. It should be borne in mind that the conviction was: 1. Rendered definitive by the 1st Chambers of the Supreme Court following an appeal by Knox on the issue 2. Effectively confirmed as definitive by the 5th Chambers of the Supreme Court 3. The 5th Chambers also poo-poo’d any attempt by the ECHR to interefere with the conviction whatever decision the ECHR came to. 4. The ECHR, in it’s ruling, did not in any event request the Italian justice system to review the safety of the conviction 5. The 5th Chambers also held, as a fact, that Knox was present in the cottage when Meredith was murdered. Accordingly she was perfectly well aware that Lumumba was not there and thus innocent. There is an argument for saying that with a lawyer present she probably would not have made the accusation incriminating Lumumba. That rather depends on what we cannot know, but it is hardly an excuse since she did (though there was no justifiable reason as to why she should, and she knew she was lying when she did. The argument being used is like saying “Well I would not have shot him if there had been someone there to stop me”. Hardly an adequate defence. I suspect that the hearing to which the MailOnline refers is really for leave to appeal - the route Guede took when challenging his definitive conviction, only to be denied leave. Again Knox is drumming up interest so that she can continue with another round of grift and money making appearances. But again - as always with the Italian Justice system - it is a question of watch this space. 2. Italian media report Translation from Italian News Service TGCOM: Meredith Kercher Case: Amanda Knox asks to cancel her sentence for slander against Lumumba Appeal to Cassation of the American for the three years of imprisonment on the basis of one of the articles introduced by the Cartobia reform. Congolese opposes “out of respect for truth and justice” Amanda Knox is asking that the definitive sentence of three years of imprisonment arrived for slander against Patrick Lumumba and linked to the trial for the murder of Meredith Kercher (for which she and Raffaele Sollecito were aquitted) be canceled. She is doing this with an appeal to the Court of Cassation on the basis of one of the articles introduced by the Cartobia reform and after the European Court of Human Rights recognized the violation of her defense rights during the investigation. However, Patrick Lumumba, the Congolese owner of the former pub Le Chic of Perugia, who was accused by the girl from Seattle and unjustly arrested for the murder, is opposed to the application. His motivation: “No to the cancellation of the sentence out of respect for truth and justice”. Acquitted for the crime of Meredith Kercher but condemned for slander towards Patrick Lumumba, Amanda Knox presented the application in the Court of Cassation through the lawyers Carlo Dalla Vedova, her historical lawyer, and Luca Luparia Donati. The appeal will be examined, in the council chamber and in non-participatory form [only lawyers present] at the beginning of October by the Fifth Chambers of Cassation. The appeal is accordingly opposed by Lumumba, represented by the lawyer Carlo Pacelli, “out of respect for truth and justice”. This court may reject the American appeal, revoke the sentence of conviction for slander, or order a renewal of the trial, which in that case would be held in Perugia. However, the possibility of a new trial is deemed very remote by Knox’s lawyers on the basis of the sentence of Cassation which acquitted her of the murder charge. A possible cancellation of the conviction for slander would not however open the way to a request for compensation for unjust detention by Knox, since the terms have expired, though she could still make a request for damages. Patrick Lumumba opposes the request of Amanda Knox to cancel the sentence against her slander towards him “out of respect for truth and justice”. “Especially in the memory of Meredith Kercher” Patrick underlined with his lawyer, the lawyer Carlo Pacelli who will also represent him in the Court of Cassation. “Lumumba immediately became a civil party against Knox and that remains party to every procedural act” added the lawyer. Lumumba was arrested for the murder of Meredith Kercher accomplished in Perugia in November 2007 based on Knox’s initial statements, but after 14 days in the cell he was released, because he was totally recognized as foreign to that crime and immediately acquitted. Amanda Knox will not be in Italy for the hearing of the Cassation which will examine her request to cancel the sentence suffered for slander to Patrick Lumumba. “The procedure will be in the council chamber and without the parties. And also Amanda is awaiting a second child ...” explained the lawyer Carlo Dalla Vedova, her defender from the initial stages of the investigation for murder. A charge from which she was definitively acquitted [actually, untrue]. It was Knox herself who asked to present the application to cancel the sentence of conviction. “She has always considered the accusation of slander unjust because she believes she had not committed that crime”. Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-09-24T13:18:00+00:00 US Justice Systems Much In The News: #1 Lethality Assessment Protocol https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/us_justice_systems_much_in_the_news_1_lethality_assessment_protocol https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/us_justice_systems_much_in_the_news_1_lethality_assessment_protocol#When:21:15:00Z {summary} Maryland State training video, similar to many 1. Context Too many US justice systems are locked in stone because of for example this: There are 17,985 police agencies in the United States which include municipal police departments, county sheriff’s offices, state troopers,and federal law enforcement agencies. Compare that to for example Italy where the forces are essentially two: the polizia and the carabinieri. Plus US laws are often badly written. Plus most judges and prosecutors are elected or politically appointed, and so tend toward a hard line. Plus forced plea-bargains are endemic. Plus for-profit prisons lobby to keep the prisoner numbers enormous.  And there are all those guns of course. Right now police recruitment is at a crisis point in many small towns which can only afford to pay peanuts - in the Gabby Petito murder case local cops were making an average of below $50,000. Compare that with the median family income of the US: $74,580. In part this is because most Americans don’t much like or trust their cops and resent paying so much for them. (Generally inferior US education is also essentially locally funded on a shoestring.) 2. Lawsuit The family of Gabby Petito are suing the Moab Utah police in part for not implementing a key system now saving many lives elsewhere. The state-level Lethality Assessment Protocols as described for Maryland above. According to the family’s attorney, Moab City Police did not use a Lethality Assessment Protocol (LAP) when they spoke with Petito and her boyfriend Brian Laundrie, during a traffic stop in August 2021. The attorney said Moab police had agreed to implement the LAP in 2018, but that “Moab was not doing anything to employ the LAP at the time … Moab responded in Gabby’s case.” The subject of a Lethality Assessment Protocol is the basis for [new state-level law] S.B.117 [for all forces].  The bill requires[all] Utah law enforcement agencies to ask a series of questions during a domestic violence call. The questions help determine whether the victim is at risk of lethal violence. At Moab, Gabby was never asked those questions and a day or two later was murdered. In fact Moab police has a domestic violence advisor on the force. There was/is a strong rule that she MUST be brought in. She would have asked those questions. But the cops at the traffic stop who misread the situation ignored this. Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-09-20T21:15:00+00:00 The Smoking Gun That Clinched Pro-Women Justice In Spain https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/the_smoking_gun_that_clinched_pro_women_justice_in_spain https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/the_smoking_gun_that_clinched_pro_women_justice_in_spain#When:02:00:00Z {summary} Watch the embattled soccer manager’s legs Overview At any moment now the top Spanish soccer manager could be out of a job. Just over a week ago at the women’s world soccer cup final in Sydney, Luis Rubiales was much-videoed hugging some winning players. All other male officials merely cordially shook their hands. When it came to the top scorer Jenni Hermoso, Rubiales held her head and aggressively planted a kiss - as she did not invite it, a possible sex crime under Spanish law. As of last Friday the national soccer association had put out a fiery statement trying to prove that Jenni was the aggressor here and she DID in effect invite the kiss. Four images purported to show that SHE lifted HIM off his feet and the kiss was no more than an amused peck. And in addressing the national association Rubiales repeatedly barked that he would not resign. Both he and the association issued legal threats. Then a number of coaches and players resigned, and many womens-team supporters were marching in the streets of Madrid.  And then today, after a five-hour closed meeting, the national association did a 180 degree turn, and insisted that Rubiales must resign. What changed? That newly emerged video above from someone in the crowd showed that Hermoso did not lift Rubiales up - in fact, he used her to push himself up into the air, and then landed and hugged and planted the kiss. So he lied. If Rubiales still tries to hang on, FIFA could ban all Spanish teams from international play, and Spanish prosecutors could haul him to court. Pesky things, cellphones, when one is breaking the rules. Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-08-29T02:00:00+00:00 This Manhattan Architect Was Charged Today As A Suspected Serial Killer https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/this_manhattan_architect_was_charged_today_as_a_suspected_serial_killer https://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php/site/this_manhattan_architect_was_charged_today_as_a_suspected_serial_killer#When:00:25:00Z {summary} LI crime spree overview as suspect’s self promoting video now awol Overview Rex Heuermann was charged today with three deaths. There could be ten at least. Search these coordinates in Google Earth for where he lives.  40°41’3.82"N 73°26’50.85"W To drop down to street view, wave the mouse pointer around at top right, and drag the little brown man to the blue line on the street. It’s the dark brown bungalow to the east.  Oddly for an architect, it’s a run-down house both inside and out - in a quite pricey neighborhood. He seems to be still married and his daughter apparently works at his firm. DNA matches seem to be the most compelling evidence. Prosecutors today had this to say: Based on the serious, heinous nature of these serial murders, the planning and forethought that went into these crimes, the strength of the People’s case, the length of incarceration the defendant faces upon conviction, the extended period of time that this Defendant was able to avoid apprehension, his recent searches for sadistic materials, child pornography, images of the victims and their relatives, counter-surveillance, conducted online as to the criminal investigation, his use of fictitious names, burner email and cellphone accounts, and his access to and history of possessing firearms, the only means to ensure Defendant Rex A. Heuermann’s return to courts to remand him without bail. So they had been observing him for quite some time. Despite what some commenters on YouTube fear (“What is the world coming to?”) the number of serial killers has been in decline in the US over the past 50 years. Most usually they are now caught fast. And New York is regularly rated now as among the safest cities in the US. Dumb place to commit any crime. Hoaxes Sollecito etc, 2023-07-15T00:25:00+00:00