![](https://truejustice.org/ee/images/website/tjmkfrontpage.jpg)
Breaking news: In its August 9th report the Florence Court again explains why Knox is guilty of unprovoked calunnia against Patrick - and left him in prison for several weeks. Very hard line, hits back against the Supreme Court's overruling of Florence in 2015. We hope to have it up in English by month's end. So Knox's deeply dishonest smear of the investigators in court in June had zero effect.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
The Defendants’ High-Stakes Blame Game: Key Moves By Rudy Guede Explained
Posted by Michael
The blame game
For many months now, the defendants and their lawyers, and for that matter the prosecutors, have been playing a fascinating game of three-dimensional chess.
None of the three have fully broken from the other two - so far. But each has been making chess-like moves that seem to be attempts to make sure they aren’t the ones - or the only ones - hung out to dry.
It is even possible that Rudy Guede’s stiff thirty-year sentence was such a move, to squeeze him to come clean at the Knox/Sollecito trial - though he may not have much to bargain with any more, if the physical and witness evidence is as encompassing as it seems.
Guede’s first story
In November 2007, shortly before his arrest, Rudy Guede had a Skype conversation with his friend Giacomo Benedetti over the Internet. It was his second, and recorded by police.
He told his friend that he knew Meredith and Amanda and he had been to the cottage on a couple of previous occasions, visiting the boys who lived downstairs. But that he wasn’t at the cottage on the day of Meredith’s murder.
Guede’s second story
This story later changed, after his arrest in Germany. It was whilst awaiting extradition back to Italy in late November 2007, that he wrote his so-called German Prison Diary.
In this diary Guede related a second version of events.
He admitted to being at the cottage the night of the murder, supposedly on a date with Meredith. But on emerging from the bathroom to the sound of screams, he was confronted by an unknown Italian male, standing over a dying Meredith, knife in hand.
After a brief struggle, the man fled, with an unseen accomplice Guede said he heard but could not see, lurking outside the cottage.
Guede’s third story
Later, in April 2008, Guede requested an audience with the prosecutor, where he gave a third account. It was essentially the same account as the second - but with key differences.
He now stated that it was Raffaele Sollecito that he saw wielding the knife in the cottage that night. And it was Amanda Knox who was the unseen accomplice outside the house, as he had recognized her voice.
A false interpretation
According to one or two Amanda Knox defense sites, this apparently damning testimony by Guede is in reality evidence for the innocence of Knox and Sollecito.
Their argument is that because Guede did not mention the other suspects in his Skype conversation, his diary, or his initial interrogation by the Italians, instead waiting until April, this serves as evidence of the duplicity of a lone-wolf criminal taking advantage of an opportunity to pass the blame onto two innocents.
However, the logic of this blame-passing argument does not stand up to close scrutiny. There was actually more going on.
RS and AK alibi problems
Amanda Knox had been arrested on 6th November, after claiming to have been in the kitchen of the cottage whilst Patrick Lumumba, the owner of the bar where Amanda worked, entered Meredith’s bedroom, and raped and then killed her.
But meanwhile, in his own interrogation, Sollecito had admitted to police that his first account (that they were together at his place all evening) had been a lie, and that Amanda had left his apartment mid-evening, not returning until the early hours of the next morning.
A court hearing then confirmed the status of Knox and Sollecito as official suspects, and denied them release or house arrest whilst the investigation unfolded. The reasons given being that there may be a flight risk, and a high potential that they may interfere with evidence and witnesses.
Case against RS and AK strengthens
From that point onwards, the case against the suspects only grew stronger, with more evidence against them emerging almost by the day. The police claimed they could place them both at the scene of the murder, and that they had what could be the murder weapon.
A large knife, found seemingly hidden in Sollecito’s apartment. Sollecito had a liking for knives, owning a collection, and admitting to having always carried one on his person since he was fourteen.
Despite Knox’s later retraction of the statement in which she had falsely accused Lumumba, their situation was steadily looking bleaker.
Rudy Guede’s new advantage
With Guede’s arrest in Germany, about three weeks after the crime, he must have known his own game could be up. Forensic evidence could link him directly to the crime scene.
At that point, he had an advantage that few suspected murderers ever have; two patsie, Knox and Sollecito, already sitting in jail and ripe for taking the fall for him.
But despite the fact that there was a case against them, and that they could not account for their whereabouts, Guede went out of his way not to actually name them.
Instead, he wove that yarn above, one that had little credibility and was widely ridiculed on the internet. Even the judge at his hearing told him his story was just not credible.
Guede still holds back
But still he avoided naming Knox and Sollecito - who if really innocent could hardly have said anything in response that would have made his situation worse. They would not have been present at the murder, and therefore, would have no counter-evidence to offer.
At that point, Guede would have had nothing at all to lose by naming them, and possibly a very great deal to gain. So why didn’t he?
It only makes any kind of logical sense that he didn’t name names if in fact Knox and Sollecito actually were at the scene of the crime.
They would then have been able to respond to Guede’s accusations with allegations of their own, which could have jeopardised any hope he may have had of being acquitted of Meredith’s murder.
Guede suddenly reverses
So why did he suddenly change his statement, and name names, and why did he wait so many months before doing so?
The answer, it would appear, lies in a change of the tactics in this chess game being pursued by Raffaele Sollecito’s defence team.
Anxious to show that a Nike footprint found in Meredith’s room was not that of their client’s, Sollecito’s team began arguing that it was in fact Guede’s.
Other noises from Sollecito’s lawyers suggested that they were readying to point the finger at Rudy Guede as a sole perpetrator, as part of their defence strategy.
Why Guede names names
For Guede, it would not have been lost on him which way the wind was blowing. Fearing that he was going to be railroaded into taking all of the blame, he responded by naming names.
Even then, though, he did not go as far as he might have. He did not claim that he actually saw Amanda, for example, only that he heard her.
However, the move did serve as a warning shot across the bows of the other suspects.
And it was an important move in the game of chess still being played out among them.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Perugia: The Jury Selection Has Now Begun
Posted by Peter Quennell
The evidence in the Knox/Sollecito trial starting 16 January will be heard by two judges, six jury members, and six jury alternates.
The Italian media are reporting that Judge Giancarlo Massei has now narrowed the jury pool down to 50 names.
From these 50 he will select the final twelve next week. For what promises to be a 2-to-3 day task, each month, over a number of months.
Will their names become known around Perugia? We’ll see. But preferably not.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Primary Timeline: An Hour-By-Hour Guide To The Events In Question
Posted by Michael
[Above: Where Meredith said goodbye to Sophie Purton - perhaps the last friendly face she ever saw.]
This narrative below is our present best shot at listing the events, actual and claimed, surrounding Meredith’s sad fate.
The constantly-updated master version of this primary timeline is posted here on the PMF forum I co-moderate with Skep. There are some subsidiary timelines which will also appear here soon.
The master version was first posted on the old True Crime MK Forum on Monday 14th April 2008. It built upon an original timeline by Xin, and I have frequently edited it since as the picture grows clearer.
You are really welcome to suggest edits, modifications, and additions, either in Comments below, or in a post below the master version itself.
Kermit’s excellent Powerpoint narrative of many of these same events was previously posted here.
Wednesday 31st October 2007 (Halloween)
Evening “Amanda…sent [Meredith] numerous SMS messages.” 1900 Meredith responds to her flatmate: “I have to go to a friend’s house for dinner.” The student from Seattle persisted, “What are you doing tonight? Do you want to meet up? Have you got a costume?” She then said that she was going to Le Chic and “maybe we’ll see each other.”
Thursday 1st November 2007 (Day of the Dead in Italy)
1300 AK saw MK at their apartment (per AK)
1400 -1500 MK left
1530 Sophie Purton arrives at Robyn Butterworth’s flat at Via Bontempi 22
1600 Meredith arrives at Robyn Butterworth’s flat
1700 AK, RS went to his apartment (per AK)
1800 Meredith had a meal with her girlfriends “Ms Kercher was known to have eaten an early supper of pizza and ice cream with two British women friends, both fellow students, at six o’clock on the evening of her death. But Sophie Purton, one of the friends, had testified that the meal contained no mushrooms.”
1800 AK, RS left her apartment (per RS)
1836 RS at his computer, had watched ‘Amelie’ whilst also downloading the film ‘Stardust’ to watch later, would be at his computer until 0333 - (per RS & his lawyers). “He was with AK until 1800 when they had both left RS apartment to go into the centre. RS has also said that he spent the evening on his computer working on his university coursework
2018 Patrick sends text message to AK
2030 Patrick’s friend, Swiss Professor Roman Mero had a pizza and then went straight to Le Chic. (had originally claimed he was in Le Chic from 2000)
2030 - 2100 RS “Went home, smoked; had dinner.”
2030 ““ 2100 (AK “left him (per RS), saying to him that she would go to Le Chic, meet friends while he returned to his house”) “”¦ left the house telling Sollecito that she was going to work, [but she], she was at the basketball court of Piazza Grimana.”
2035 AK text message to PL
2038 RG arrives at MK’s (per RG)
2038 PL’s cellphone pings in the area of MK’s house
2040** RS’s father phones him at his apartment on RS’s landline, the call went unanswered and instead went to answer phone. RS did not respond to the message and return his father’s call that night
2040** Young woman, Popovic (Polish after all (?)), arrives at RS’s house to tell him she no longer needed a lift to the station. (She spoke to Amanda via the intercom (?) )
2040** Serbian student, Jovanovic, ‘met’ (Could do with clarification as to whether he simply passed AK, or actually engaged with her in some way). AK on Corso Garibaldi. AK and RS were at RS’s flat at this time and before (per AK/RS)
2040** AK and RS cell phones turned off
2043 AK seen on CCTV entering her house (?)
2046 Meredith arrives eight minutes after RG arrives (per RG)
2050 RS chops up button mushrooms with his knife, and he and AK stir fry them (per Mignini)
2100 AK claimed to meet PL at B-Ball courts and [return] to her house. (per the Judge)
2100 Meredith leaves friend’s house with Sophie Purton to return home, Sophie walks her halfway
2105 Sophie Purton leaves Meredith on Via Roscetto, Meredith continues home alone
2110 Click on RS’s computer, no more activity on computer until following day
2115 Around this time MK arrives home
2130 Meredith commences phone call with mother (What time did it end?)
2141 - 0532 of the night of the crime “is not any human interaction.at RS apt” (per RS’ computer)
2200 - 2230 Meredith is either dead or dying. A breakdown truck arrives for a broken down car containing a family of three, man, woman and child. The Albanian ‘superwitness’, Hekuran Kokomani, arrives by car at the rubbish bins area a short way down the road from the cottage. HK punches RS, throws a phone and olives at AK, who threatens HK with knife. HK drives further down the road encountering RG who recognises HK and offers money to hire HK’s car, first 50, then offering 250 euros. HK hears banging sounding like ‘wood on wood’ from the house. RG says there is a birthday party at the cottage. HK refuses hire his car, driving off having seen RS in his wing mirror running at him with knife. RS persues him to the lights, where a motorist asks HK for directions. HK has to reverse his car to allow the breakdown truck, which is probably just arriving, to manoeuvre. HK leaves (per HK)
2215 SMS requesting account balance sent from MK’s mobile to her bank balance
2229 First recorded receipts at Le Chic
2230 - 2300 A witness heard “a man and a woman arguing in Italian” inside the cottage “at about 10.30 or 11.00 on the night of November 1,” followed by an “agonising scream”.
2230 “Alessandra Formica, a police witness, said her partner was almost knocked over by a black man running away from scene”. The couple also witness the broken down car and breakdown truck.
2300 (circa) A dark coloured car is seen parked outside the cottage (per garage mechanic witness - Gianfranco Lombardi). “It was about 11pm on the night of November 1, 2007, and I was in the area because I had been called out to fix a broken-down car…When I got to Via Sant Antonio, close to where the house where Meredith Kercher was murdered, I saw a dark-coloured car parked outside and I noticed the gate on the drive was open…I didn’t notice anyone in the car and I didn’t notice anyone coming or going during the eight or 10 minutes it took me to load the broken-down car onto my tow truck.” “The statement is significant because Sollecito has a dark-coloured car, but claims he was not at the house.”
2300 RS reveives telephone call from his father (per RS). Now known to be untrue as the unanswered call via landline was actually made at 2040 and went to answerphone
2300 (circa) Nara Capezalli, the woman who lives opposite MK’s, hears screams coming from the house after which “at least two people” emerged and fled “in different directions.”
2300 - 2330 AK and RS are seen on the baseball court by a sixty-year-old witness, ‘Toto’ (Antonio Curatolo), cuddling, behaving erratically, and looking towards the house…” “...their position of observation on the steps near via della Pergola overlooking the house.” “I saw Amanda and Raffaele around the square in 23-23,30 Grimana the first night of November. I am sure because the next morning the carabinieri were on the streets asking questions. ” AK and RS go down in the direction of the house (possibly joined by a third person (?))
2300 - 0100 RS claims he’s on Internet at his home
Friday 2nd November 2007
0100 AK at RS’s apt (?)
0200 Witnesses report seeing Rudy dancing down the Domus nightclub. Passers-by report loud voices from AK/MK home
0333 RS comes off of his computer and goes to bed, Amanda is ‘not’ there (per RS & his lawyers)
0430 Last sighting of Rudy at the Domus nightclub by witnesses.
0532 Internet activity noted at RS’s computer, (Googling ‘Bleach’ & ‘Blood’ perhaps ?). Phones turned back on?
Dawn Mobile phones switched back on (Would be great to have the actual time for this event)
0745 Witness places AK outside supermarket
0830 Bleach receipt supplied by the market (?) - RS/AK in bed (per RS/AK)
0915 Bleach receipt supplied by the market (?) - RS/AK in bed (per RS/AK)
1000 Woke up at RS’s in morning (per RS)
1030 AK returns to her house to wash; took empty plastic bag (per RS)
1100 AK was back at her house (per AK)
1130 AK back at RS’s house; worried””door open (per RS). Back to AK’s together. AK opens door with keys; went in together. Blood in bathroom. Attempted to break down Meredith’s door (per RS)
0900 - 1200 Sig.na Lana finds two phones in her garden and notify police, who ascertain that one is registered to Filomena Romanelli at via della Pergola
1226 “Today it was confirmed that the garage video recorded the car of the postal police arriving at 12.26…” and find AK and RS outside (but within the gate), who said they were waiting for the Carabinieri.”
1235 Filomena, having spent the night away with her boyfriend Marco Zaroli, whilst parking their car (with PG and LA) at the ‘Fair of the Dead’ in Perugia, receives phonecall (first of a series of three) from AK “who told me that she had slept at Raffaele’s house and that when she had gone back to our house she had found the door open and blood in her bathroom. She told me that she’d had a shower, that she was scared and that she was going to call Raffaele Sollecito. It seemed really strange to me and I asked her to check that the house was in order and to call the police or Carabinieri.” (Michael: “Going to call” RS when AK and RS claim they came back to the cottage together at 1130?)
1235 - 1245 Second phone conversation between AK and FR
1245 Third phone conversation between AK and FR “she told me that the window in my room was broken and that my room was in a mess. At this point I asked her to call the police and she told me that she already had.”
1250 RS calls his sister in the Carabinieri
1251 RS phones the Carabinieri (for the first time)
1254 RS phones the Carabinieri again
1300 (just before) Filomena Romanelli arrives at apartment with her friends PA (Paola Grande - girlfriend of Luca) and LA (Luca Altieri). M (Marco) was present and “Amanda and Raffaele were in Amanda’s room because at a certain point they came out into the corridor and we introduced ourselves.” (Michael: Evidently, RS and AK failed to notice Meredith’s keys whilst they were hidden away in her room. Why were they in AK’s room when important actions were taking place elsewhere in the cottage, leaving non-resident Marco to deal with the Postal Police? How long were they in there for? ‘What’ were they doing whilst in there - checking it was ‘clean’?)
1305 Postal Police arrive (per RS and his lawyers)
1315 (circa) After listening to Filomena’s remarks, with Postal Police present, LA breaks down door of MK’s room
Evening PG and LA take RS and AK to Perugia police station in their car. PG and LA have stated that during the trip RS was constantly asking them questions regarding the murder and investigation of a manner that caused them to become so concerned and suspicious, they thorougly checked over the interior of the car after RS and AK got out, for ‘incriminating evidence’ they were afraid the pair may have ‘planted’ there. The ‘suspicious’ behaviour of the couple continued inside the police station, which was noted and reported by multiple witnesses
**These times must be very approximate since the 20:40 time slot is ‘very’ congested.
Friday, December 05, 2008
Formal Kercher Request That Trial Be Behind Closed Doors
Posted by Peter Quennell
The Kercher family have now formally filed the request that the trial of Knox and Sollecito be held behind closed doors.
The Kerchers’ request was filed by their extremely capable court-appointed lawyer, Francesco Maresca, with the Court of Assizes in Perugia.
The Court will announce its decision on this at the first, public, session of the Knox/Sollecito trial on 16 January.
The trial of Rudy Guede - which was also behind closed doors - largely hinged on evidence from Meredith’s bedroom and from her autopsy.
That evidence was said to have been extremely disturbing to many inside the court-room, and resulted in Guede’s very stiff 30-year sentence.
If the evidence not yet in the public domain really is as sickening as is rumored, it is hard to see the defense teams resisting the request.
And the Italian system hardly needs to prove publicly its extreme caution, carefulness, and fairness. Despite some absurd claims to the contrary.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
So The Trial Date IS Postponed, Now It’s 16 January
Posted by Peter Quennell
This is a translation of the report from La Stampa.
Meredith process, hearing postponed
Amanda and Raffaele have to answer to the charge of murder
The case against Amanda and Raffaele is postponed to allow for the reading of additional investigations carried out by the Public Prosecutor
Postponed to January 16, 2009, is the hearing for the murder of Meredith Kercher, which initiates the trialproceedings against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, who are accused of murder in the taunting and violence against American student (Rudy Guede has already been sentenced to 30 years jis trial having been expedited, ed.)
The presiding judge, Giancarlo Massei, deferred the opening session to enable the parties to get to know the contents of the additional investigations carried out by the prosecutor of Perugia. Tomorrow is the deadline for the submission of lists and texts that will amount to a total of about a hundred.
And a brief summary of some of the other recent developments in the case….
- A witness who knew her claims to have seen Amanda Knox in a supermarket early on the day after the crime
- A second witness claims to have heard a scream on the evening of the crime, this one stating a precise time
- A witness claims to have seen Knox, Sollecito and Guede together previously - if so, they did know one another
- A cut was apparently seen on Knox’s neck by another house resident; autopsy and scenario are being reviewed
- A fund-raising event in Seattle apparently raised $11,000 to help defray Knox’s parents’ defense and travel costs
- And a Kercher family request for a closed-door trial - permitted in Italy for sex crimes - is now being reviewed
One of the great areas of conjecture is whether the alleged defendants actually pre-planned an assault on Meredith. Or whether it was perhaps just a taunt, one that took on a deadly spiral.
There was an apparent simultaneous switching-off of their mobiles earlier in the evening, for a reason not so far explained. And now an apparent prior three-way relationship between the two charged and the one sentenced? This does not look good.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Hoax: Huge Problem With “There Is No Evidence”
Posted by Peter Quennell
Startling new evidence…
Today reports are surfacing in Italy that a witness (one of the hidden 100) seems to have seen Amanda Knox in this Conad supermarket (lower right and below) at 7:45 on the morning after the crime.
Knox apparently claimed she was asleep in Sollecito’s apartment to around 10:00 am.
This supermarket (right above) is maybe 50 meters from the School for Foreigners (ahead above). About 600 meters from Raffaele Solecito’s apartment (behind above). And about 300 meters from Meredith’s house (left above).
It sells, among other things, laundry detergent (laundry of Meredith’s clothes may have been happening when the cops arrived) and bleach (the place might have been bleached to hide evidence).
Amanda Knox may have been seen in that detergent and bleach area, by someone who knows her, and then seen exiting in the direction of her house - Meredith’s house.
New evidence should really not come as much of a surprise.
Despite claims to the contrary - that it has all been leaked, and found wanting - the evidence in this case is actually more like an iceberg.
Eighty-plus percent of it is still out of sight. Little of what is in those 10,000 pages of sealed evidence, added to daily by new witnesses, is known to outsiders.
Much of what we HAVE seen of it hangs true.
And those few who are insiders seem to get noticeably more quiet and cautious when they do see it. Rudy Guede’s lawyers were bullish about his prospects - until they saw it.
And then Rudy Guede got handed 30 years.
The defendants really deserve a GOOD defense. By their lawyers. And hopefully, at long last, by their friends.
Sliming Italy and the players in the case looks like a slow-motion train-wreck to us. Available evidence deserves to be gone over without reflexive shoot-from-the-hip dismissal.
So. No evidence? Perhaps that mantra should now be laid to rest. It’s increasingly looking to be flat-out wrong.
And a quick shortcut to a life behind bars.
Friday, November 14, 2008
La Nazione Is Reporting There Will Be Nearly 100 Witnesses
Posted by Peter Quennell
Including a possible three new eye-witnesses in the vicinity of the house on the night in question.
And that the lawyer for the Kercher family, Mr Maresca, says they would prefer no TV cameras in the courtroom.
English translation here if and when we get one. But that is the main news in the piece.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Ground Increasingly Disappearing From Under Knox-Sollecito Defense
Posted by Peter Quennell
Judge Paolo Micheli has now been interviewed by Messaggero Umbria, a newspaper published in Perugia.
The judge really seems to have arrived at a very clear conception of how the cruel, senseless deed took place. Observe in particular these findings below.
All of them are devastating to the talking-points of Friends Of Amanda recently parroted in dozens of news outlets.
Three attackers were present
I took the opposite approach to that of the defence teams. The lawyers claimed that there was no proof of conspiracy between the three because they didn’t know each other and Kokomani’s testimony wasn’t reliable. They also said that it would have been impossible for them to have organised the crime since they had previous commitments which then fell through. My starting point was the three’s presence in the room where the crime was committed.
DNA on the bra clasp was RS’s
I don’t believe [the bra clasp] was contaminated. The dna either came from outside or it was in the room. It’s not possible that Raffaele Sollecito’s dna was in that room. He had no reason to go there.
No contamination of the knife DNA
It’s true that Amanda’s dna was also on another knife found at Sollecito’s home but there can’t have been contamination. I checked both the objects seized from the cottage in via della Pergola and Sollecito’s apartment in corso Garibaldi. Only once, on Nov6 last year, were objects taken from both locations on the same day and the officers who entered the two buildings were not the same.
Guede was not unknown to other two
The fact that there were no calls [with Rudy] is easy to explain; since Oct27, Rudy hasn’t had a mobile phone. It was taken off him by the police. One of the couple knew Rudy. Meeting people in Perugia is easy, it could have been a chance meeting too.
There was definitely sexual assault
There are some doubts about the dynamics and the position of the victim’s body when she was stabbed. These are however not sufficent to repudiate the hypothesis of sexual assault…. Sexual assault is also an “˜invasion’ of the body as was described in the autopsy. It is certain that the rapist pulled the victim’s top up. Some blood had also run down onto the trousers. It’s therefore plausible to think that whoever violated the victim put their hand down her trousers.
Why there was no rape
Why didnt they complete a rape?] Because she screamed. Also with a knife at her throat and being held down it’s likely that she shouted out. There is a witness, Nara Capezzali, who said she woke up and was shocked by this scream.
Meredith was restrained while taunted
On the victim’s right-hand there was one small cut, a few milimetres long, in between two fingers. On the left-hand, there were four clearly visible cuts. Also the tip of the finger had blood on it. This indicates that the victim’s right-hand was being held as she tried to defend herself with the left. After the fatal stab, she put her hands on the wound.
That last remark really drives home the true horror of Meredith’s incredibly cruel last few minutes. Someone was ferociously slashing away at Meredith like a maniac with a knife. And then did nothing at all to save her.
Walked out on her while she was still alive, clutching her neck to stop the life-blood flowing out of her.
After months of murky semi-silence from police and prosecutors, now the sentencing dossier quoted below and this interview seem like a fire-hose of information.
Is the judge signaling to the defense that a long-form trial will not work to their advantage? That they should simply cave now? Plead guilty, and hope?
And if they don’t, how on earth can they fight THIS sad, sick, depraved stuff?
Judge Micheli’s First Statement - The 10,000 Pages Start To Talk EDIT
Posted by Peter Quennell
Here now is the full 2011 Micheli Report kindly translated by Catnip for the Wiki and TJMK.
Judge Micheli’s dossier.
This below is from London’s Daily Telegraph. Click above for the full story.
In a dossier on the high-profile case, Judge Paolo Micheli said the 21 year-old’s murder was more likely spontaneous rather than pre-planned.
The judge, however, appears to agree with prosecution claims that the Leeds University student was murdered by more than one person.
He said that footprints in the flat showed there was more than one attacker in Miss Kercher’s flat on the night she was killed.
The revelations came after the Italian judge rejected one of her accused killer’s applications for bail…
Judge Micheli said he feared the two suspects could flee the country or commit another murder.
[Meredith’s] semi-naked body was found in the whitewashed cottage she shared with Miss Knox and two other students on November 2 last year.
She had been stabbed in the neck three times, and sustained more than 40 other injuries.
The judge attached weight to a kitchen knife found in Mr Sollecito’s flat which allegedly carried traces of Miss Knox’s DNA on the handle and Miss Kercher’s DNA on the blade.
He also said there were inconsistencies in Mr Sollecito’s accounts of where he was that night.
Prosecutor Giuliano Mignini told the court last week that Miss Kercher was killed when all three suspects tried to force her to participate in “a perverse group sex game”.
Judge Paolo Micheli has a terrific reputation as a judge, He did not of course devote only last Tuesday to reviewing the case. That has been a full-time job for him for several months now. In particular, he will have read the 10,000 pages of evidence the police and prosecutor have submitted. Almost certainly again and again.
The partial evidence already out here is pretty telling to those who have worked so hard to put it all together. And the 30-year sentence Judge Micheli handed down to Rudy Guede on Tuesday suggests just how overwhelming the full body of evidence must be. How it must really hang together.
And how it must evoke the intense agony of the final moments of Meredith Kercher, as she was seemingly tortured to death amid laughter and taunts. What is actually in those 10,000 pages will soon be common knowledge, by way of both the Knox/Sollecito trial in December and the Guede appeal thereafter.
Tick tick tick..
Supreme Court Denies The Pair Bail, Insists On Prison To End Of Process EDIT
Posted by Peter Quennell
(Reuters) - A 21-year-old American exchange student indicted in Italy for the murder of her British flatmate, Meredith Kercher, was denied house arrest on Wednesday by a judge who ruled she was too great a flight risk to release from jail.
Amanda Knox’s Italian boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito, 24, was also denied house arrest as the couple await trial, set to begin on December 4.
Sollecito’s lawyer said Judge Paolo Micheli feared the two suspects could flee the country or commit another murder.
Knox and Sollecito have been held in jail since shortly after the killing last November of 21-year-old student Kercher, whose semi-naked body was found in her apartment in the university city of Perugia in central Italy.
Prosecutors say Kercher was stabbed in the neck when Knox, Sollecito and a third suspect tried to involve her in an orgy. The case has riveted Italians and received wide cover in the media.
The third suspect, 21-year-old Rudy Guede, was sentenced to 30 years in prison on Tuesday for rape and murder.
Guede, born in the Ivory Coast, had chosen a fast-track procedure with no jury, which under Italian law allows suspects to receive a lesser sentence if they are convicted. Prosecutors had requested life in prison.
All three suspects deny wrongdoing.