Headsup: Disney's Hulu -: mafia tool? First warning already sent to the Knox series production team about the hoaxes and mafia connections. The Daily Beast's badly researched Grace Harrington calls it "the true story of Knox’s wrongful conviction of the murder of her roommate". Really?!
Saturday, December 27, 2008
Where The Convicted Perp And The Defendants Are Now
Posted by Peter Quennell
About one hour’s drive apart.
Not that they are doing too much driving these days, of course. Due to present circumstances.
Italy’s prison system is among the more innovative in terms of the rehabilitation of prisoners. If they need one, prisoners get taught a trade skill before they bounce back into society.
So Rudy Guede, along with (if convicted) Amanda Knox and (if convicted) Raffaele Sollecito, could re-enter society as champion pizza makers.
That’ll be the very good European pizzas, of course. The wonderful Four Seasons for example. With artichokes.
That could go over very well in mid-century Seattle.
And this structure below is? Answer is below the shot.
The solar heating on Terni prison. This was the first solar heating on prisons in Italy. It would seem that Sollecito is the most snug of the three.
At least in the summer, when the sun shines the most.
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Okay The Whole World Gets To Hear Who’s On The Jury
Posted by Peter Quennell
The need for security must be minimal.
And Judge Massei’s desire for transparency perhaps maximal - he has already taken pains to emphasize that the conclusions of the six Peoples’ Judges get equal wight with the conclusions of the two Court of Assizes judges when they all huddle together to decide guilt or innocence.
La Nazione has published the names - so far, the only Italian paper to do so - and a couple of biographical details.
- Anna Maria Artegiani (51): her profession is listed as secretary of a primary school and she lives in Marsciano. There is a prominent Perugian artist. with the same name.
- Angelico Evangelisti (38): no details of him as yet
- Maria Ludovica Morelli (37): no details of her as yet
- Angela Irene Ceccarini (43): she now lives in Perugia and is originally from Todi
- Andrea Valentini Valentini (35): he is a criminal lawyer in Perugia, and is originally from Umbertide
- Paolo Rapetti (57): no details of him as yet; there is a Perugian footballer of that name.
Several of them have apparently not been following the case, and were uneasy at the wall of reporters’ notebooks confronting them and the coming publicity.
Judge Massei remarked that the role of Peoples’ Judge in this case is a civic duty, and with a dry smile urged enthusiasm for something that does not happen often in most peoples’ lifetimes.
Too much publicity? Perhaps. The Italian papers have new stories several times a week. Periodically some of them do seem to go ape over what look like defendants’ stunts aimed at sympathy.
Yesterday Nicki kindly posted negative comments from Corriere della Sera on Rudy Guede’s shot at fame as a poet. The backlash could lead to more secluded digs for the perps if found guilty.
But frequent commenter DS was left wondering if the perps - one perp, anyway - could still come out way ahead of the game.
Discussing the case on a dedicated blog is one thing, but the tabloid press have gone to town on this story… Even I’m getting sick of seeing Amanda in the press and I’m following this story like a bloodhound!!
If Amanda is found innocent, she’ll be in Italian Hello magazine showing off her fab new kitchen & her amazing figure by the end of her first week of freedom. If she is found guilty, she will be notorious and have TV movies made of her life.
Considering that she will be out of prison even with a guilty verdict by the time she is 50, she will have a nice media-paid-for nest egg to come out to and slip into obscurity.
[Australian prisoner in Indonesia] Schapelle Corby (according to the Sydney Morning Herald libel fans!) is making piles of money by handing all her biography copyrights to her sister’s Balinese husband but then people are more assured of her innocence and she hasn’t changed her story.
Regardless, Amanda will no doubt find a way to profit from this media interest whatever happens. In a sick hideous way, this case is possibly the best thing that has even happened to Amanda thanks to the papers.
They need to starve her of the publicity oxygen that her and her parents so clearly crave by their continuing to feed the media beast.
Monday, December 22, 2008
Perugia: Jury Selection May Be Completed Today
Posted by Peter Quennell
Update: three men and three women ranging from 35 to 57 years old, including a young lawyer, have been selected. Three women and one man have been selected as alternates.
Italian media are reporting that a jury of six, with four alternates, should be announced by the close of court business today. We remain curious as to whether their names will become public.
Judge Beatrice Cristiani is now mentioned to be the second judge alongside Judge Giancarlo Massei, the President of the Court of Assize. The name we have been seeing previously was Judge Carla Giangamoni.
Also being reported is this attempt at poetry by Rudy Guede, six weeks into his 30-year sentence.
My tears are born from the darkness of solitude, full of pain. My tears, my tears. Transparent as water are my tears, but full of truth and love.
Doesn’t read to us like a confession or a reaching-out to the Kerchers for forgiveness. Reader comments under the story on the Corriere della Sera website are universally negative.
He has twenty-nine years and 46 weeks to rework it.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
The Defendants’ High-Stakes Blame Game: Key Moves By Rudy Guede Explained
Posted by Michael
The blame game
For many months now, the defendants and their lawyers, and for that matter the prosecutors, have been playing a fascinating game of three-dimensional chess.
None of the three have fully broken from the other two - so far. But each has been making chess-like moves that seem to be attempts to make sure they aren’t the ones - or the only ones - hung out to dry.
It is even possible that Rudy Guede’s stiff thirty-year sentence was such a move, to squeeze him to come clean at the Knox/Sollecito trial - though he may not have much to bargain with any more, if the physical and witness evidence is as encompassing as it seems.
Guede’s first story
In November 2007, shortly before his arrest, Rudy Guede had a Skype conversation with his friend Giacomo Benedetti over the Internet. It was his second, and recorded by police.
He told his friend that he knew Meredith and Amanda and he had been to the cottage on a couple of previous occasions, visiting the boys who lived downstairs. But that he wasn’t at the cottage on the day of Meredith’s murder.
Guede’s second story
This story later changed, after his arrest in Germany. It was whilst awaiting extradition back to Italy in late November 2007, that he wrote his so-called German Prison Diary.
In this diary Guede related a second version of events.
He admitted to being at the cottage the night of the murder, supposedly on a date with Meredith. But on emerging from the bathroom to the sound of screams, he was confronted by an unknown Italian male, standing over a dying Meredith, knife in hand.
After a brief struggle, the man fled, with an unseen accomplice Guede said he heard but could not see, lurking outside the cottage.
Guede’s third story
Later, in April 2008, Guede requested an audience with the prosecutor, where he gave a third account. It was essentially the same account as the second - but with key differences.
He now stated that it was Raffaele Sollecito that he saw wielding the knife in the cottage that night. And it was Amanda Knox who was the unseen accomplice outside the house, as he had recognized her voice.
A false interpretation
According to one or two Amanda Knox defense sites, this apparently damning testimony by Guede is in reality evidence for the innocence of Knox and Sollecito.
Their argument is that because Guede did not mention the other suspects in his Skype conversation, his diary, or his initial interrogation by the Italians, instead waiting until April, this serves as evidence of the duplicity of a lone-wolf criminal taking advantage of an opportunity to pass the blame onto two innocents.
However, the logic of this blame-passing argument does not stand up to close scrutiny. There was actually more going on.
RS and AK alibi problems
Amanda Knox had been arrested on 6th November, after claiming to have been in the kitchen of the cottage whilst Patrick Lumumba, the owner of the bar where Amanda worked, entered Meredith’s bedroom, and raped and then killed her.
But meanwhile, in his own interrogation, Sollecito had admitted to police that his first account (that they were together at his place all evening) had been a lie, and that Amanda had left his apartment mid-evening, not returning until the early hours of the next morning.
A court hearing then confirmed the status of Knox and Sollecito as official suspects, and denied them release or house arrest whilst the investigation unfolded. The reasons given being that there may be a flight risk, and a high potential that they may interfere with evidence and witnesses.
Case against RS and AK strengthens
From that point onwards, the case against the suspects only grew stronger, with more evidence against them emerging almost by the day. The police claimed they could place them both at the scene of the murder, and that they had what could be the murder weapon.
A large knife, found seemingly hidden in Sollecito’s apartment. Sollecito had a liking for knives, owning a collection, and admitting to having always carried one on his person since he was fourteen.
Despite Knox’s later retraction of the statement in which she had falsely accused Lumumba, their situation was steadily looking bleaker.
Rudy Guede’s new advantage
With Guede’s arrest in Germany, about three weeks after the crime, he must have known his own game could be up. Forensic evidence could link him directly to the crime scene.
At that point, he had an advantage that few suspected murderers ever have; two patsie, Knox and Sollecito, already sitting in jail and ripe for taking the fall for him.
But despite the fact that there was a case against them, and that they could not account for their whereabouts, Guede went out of his way not to actually name them.
Instead, he wove that yarn above, one that had little credibility and was widely ridiculed on the internet. Even the judge at his hearing told him his story was just not credible.
Guede still holds back
But still he avoided naming Knox and Sollecito - who if really innocent could hardly have said anything in response that would have made his situation worse. They would not have been present at the murder, and therefore, would have no counter-evidence to offer.
At that point, Guede would have had nothing at all to lose by naming them, and possibly a very great deal to gain. So why didn’t he?
It only makes any kind of logical sense that he didn’t name names if in fact Knox and Sollecito actually were at the scene of the crime.
They would then have been able to respond to Guede’s accusations with allegations of their own, which could have jeopardised any hope he may have had of being acquitted of Meredith’s murder.
Guede suddenly reverses
So why did he suddenly change his statement, and name names, and why did he wait so many months before doing so?
The answer, it would appear, lies in a change of the tactics in this chess game being pursued by Raffaele Sollecito’s defence team.
Anxious to show that a Nike footprint found in Meredith’s room was not that of their client’s, Sollecito’s team began arguing that it was in fact Guede’s.
Other noises from Sollecito’s lawyers suggested that they were readying to point the finger at Rudy Guede as a sole perpetrator, as part of their defence strategy.
Why Guede names names
For Guede, it would not have been lost on him which way the wind was blowing. Fearing that he was going to be railroaded into taking all of the blame, he responded by naming names.
Even then, though, he did not go as far as he might have. He did not claim that he actually saw Amanda, for example, only that he heard her.
However, the move did serve as a warning shot across the bows of the other suspects.
And it was an important move in the game of chess still being played out among them.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Perugia: The Jury Selection Has Now Begun
Posted by Peter Quennell
The evidence in the Knox/Sollecito trial starting 16 January will be heard by two judges, six jury members, and six jury alternates.
The Italian media are reporting that Judge Giancarlo Massei has now narrowed the jury pool down to 50 names.
From these 50 he will select the final twelve next week. For what promises to be a 2-to-3 day task, each month, over a number of months.
Will their names become known around Perugia? We’ll see. But preferably not.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Primary Timeline: An Hour-By-Hour Guide To The Events In Question
Posted by Michael
[Above: Where Meredith said goodbye to Sophie Purton - perhaps the last friendly face she ever saw.]
This narrative below is our present best shot at listing the events, actual and claimed, surrounding Meredith’s sad fate.
The constantly-updated master version of this primary timeline is posted here on the PMF forum I co-moderate with Skep. There are some subsidiary timelines which will also appear here soon.
The master version was first posted on the old True Crime MK Forum on Monday 14th April 2008. It built upon an original timeline by Xin, and I have frequently edited it since as the picture grows clearer.
You are really welcome to suggest edits, modifications, and additions, either in Comments below, or in a post below the master version itself.
Kermit’s excellent Powerpoint narrative of many of these same events was previously posted here.
Wednesday 31st October 2007 (Halloween)
Evening “Amanda…sent [Meredith] numerous SMS messages.” 1900 Meredith responds to her flatmate: “I have to go to a friend’s house for dinner.” The student from Seattle persisted, “What are you doing tonight? Do you want to meet up? Have you got a costume?” She then said that she was going to Le Chic and “maybe we’ll see each other.”
Thursday 1st November 2007 (Day of the Dead in Italy)
1300 AK saw MK at their apartment (per AK)
1400 -1500 MK left
1530 Sophie Purton arrives at Robyn Butterworth’s flat at Via Bontempi 22
1600 Meredith arrives at Robyn Butterworth’s flat
1700 AK, RS went to his apartment (per AK)
1800 Meredith had a meal with her girlfriends “Ms Kercher was known to have eaten an early supper of pizza and ice cream with two British women friends, both fellow students, at six o’clock on the evening of her death. But Sophie Purton, one of the friends, had testified that the meal contained no mushrooms.”
1800 AK, RS left her apartment (per RS)
1836 RS at his computer, had watched ‘Amelie’ whilst also downloading the film ‘Stardust’ to watch later, would be at his computer until 0333 - (per RS & his lawyers). “He was with AK until 1800 when they had both left RS apartment to go into the centre. RS has also said that he spent the evening on his computer working on his university coursework
2018 Patrick sends text message to AK
2030 Patrick’s friend, Swiss Professor Roman Mero had a pizza and then went straight to Le Chic. (had originally claimed he was in Le Chic from 2000)
2030 - 2100 RS “Went home, smoked; had dinner.”
2030 ““ 2100 (AK “left him (per RS), saying to him that she would go to Le Chic, meet friends while he returned to his house”) “”¦ left the house telling Sollecito that she was going to work, [but she], she was at the basketball court of Piazza Grimana.”
2035 AK text message to PL
2038 RG arrives at MK’s (per RG)
2038 PL’s cellphone pings in the area of MK’s house
2040** RS’s father phones him at his apartment on RS’s landline, the call went unanswered and instead went to answer phone. RS did not respond to the message and return his father’s call that night
2040** Young woman, Popovic (Polish after all (?)), arrives at RS’s house to tell him she no longer needed a lift to the station. (She spoke to Amanda via the intercom (?) )
2040** Serbian student, Jovanovic, ‘met’ (Could do with clarification as to whether he simply passed AK, or actually engaged with her in some way). AK on Corso Garibaldi. AK and RS were at RS’s flat at this time and before (per AK/RS)
2040** AK and RS cell phones turned off
2043 AK seen on CCTV entering her house (?)
2046 Meredith arrives eight minutes after RG arrives (per RG)
2050 RS chops up button mushrooms with his knife, and he and AK stir fry them (per Mignini)
2100 AK claimed to meet PL at B-Ball courts and [return] to her house. (per the Judge)
2100 Meredith leaves friend’s house with Sophie Purton to return home, Sophie walks her halfway
2105 Sophie Purton leaves Meredith on Via Roscetto, Meredith continues home alone
2110 Click on RS’s computer, no more activity on computer until following day
2115 Around this time MK arrives home
2130 Meredith commences phone call with mother (What time did it end?)
2141 - 0532 of the night of the crime “is not any human interaction.at RS apt” (per RS’ computer)
2200 - 2230 Meredith is either dead or dying. A breakdown truck arrives for a broken down car containing a family of three, man, woman and child. The Albanian ‘superwitness’, Hekuran Kokomani, arrives by car at the rubbish bins area a short way down the road from the cottage. HK punches RS, throws a phone and olives at AK, who threatens HK with knife. HK drives further down the road encountering RG who recognises HK and offers money to hire HK’s car, first 50, then offering 250 euros. HK hears banging sounding like ‘wood on wood’ from the house. RG says there is a birthday party at the cottage. HK refuses hire his car, driving off having seen RS in his wing mirror running at him with knife. RS persues him to the lights, where a motorist asks HK for directions. HK has to reverse his car to allow the breakdown truck, which is probably just arriving, to manoeuvre. HK leaves (per HK)
2215 SMS requesting account balance sent from MK’s mobile to her bank balance
2229 First recorded receipts at Le Chic
2230 - 2300 A witness heard “a man and a woman arguing in Italian” inside the cottage “at about 10.30 or 11.00 on the night of November 1,” followed by an “agonising scream”.
2230 “Alessandra Formica, a police witness, said her partner was almost knocked over by a black man running away from scene”. The couple also witness the broken down car and breakdown truck.
2300 (circa) A dark coloured car is seen parked outside the cottage (per garage mechanic witness - Gianfranco Lombardi). “It was about 11pm on the night of November 1, 2007, and I was in the area because I had been called out to fix a broken-down car…When I got to Via Sant Antonio, close to where the house where Meredith Kercher was murdered, I saw a dark-coloured car parked outside and I noticed the gate on the drive was open…I didn’t notice anyone in the car and I didn’t notice anyone coming or going during the eight or 10 minutes it took me to load the broken-down car onto my tow truck.” “The statement is significant because Sollecito has a dark-coloured car, but claims he was not at the house.”
2300 RS reveives telephone call from his father (per RS). Now known to be untrue as the unanswered call via landline was actually made at 2040 and went to answerphone
2300 (circa) Nara Capezalli, the woman who lives opposite MK’s, hears screams coming from the house after which “at least two people” emerged and fled “in different directions.”
2300 - 2330 AK and RS are seen on the baseball court by a sixty-year-old witness, ‘Toto’ (Antonio Curatolo), cuddling, behaving erratically, and looking towards the house…” “...their position of observation on the steps near via della Pergola overlooking the house.” “I saw Amanda and Raffaele around the square in 23-23,30 Grimana the first night of November. I am sure because the next morning the carabinieri were on the streets asking questions. ” AK and RS go down in the direction of the house (possibly joined by a third person (?))
2300 - 0100 RS claims he’s on Internet at his home
Friday 2nd November 2007
0100 AK at RS’s apt (?)
0200 Witnesses report seeing Rudy dancing down the Domus nightclub. Passers-by report loud voices from AK/MK home
0333 RS comes off of his computer and goes to bed, Amanda is ‘not’ there (per RS & his lawyers)
0430 Last sighting of Rudy at the Domus nightclub by witnesses.
0532 Internet activity noted at RS’s computer, (Googling ‘Bleach’ & ‘Blood’ perhaps ?). Phones turned back on?
Dawn Mobile phones switched back on (Would be great to have the actual time for this event)
0745 Witness places AK outside supermarket
0830 Bleach receipt supplied by the market (?) - RS/AK in bed (per RS/AK)
0915 Bleach receipt supplied by the market (?) - RS/AK in bed (per RS/AK)
1000 Woke up at RS’s in morning (per RS)
1030 AK returns to her house to wash; took empty plastic bag (per RS)
1100 AK was back at her house (per AK)
1130 AK back at RS’s house; worried””door open (per RS). Back to AK’s together. AK opens door with keys; went in together. Blood in bathroom. Attempted to break down Meredith’s door (per RS)
0900 - 1200 Sig.na Lana finds two phones in her garden and notify police, who ascertain that one is registered to Filomena Romanelli at via della Pergola
1226 “Today it was confirmed that the garage video recorded the car of the postal police arriving at 12.26…” and find AK and RS outside (but within the gate), who said they were waiting for the Carabinieri.”
1235 Filomena, having spent the night away with her boyfriend Marco Zaroli, whilst parking their car (with PG and LA) at the ‘Fair of the Dead’ in Perugia, receives phonecall (first of a series of three) from AK “who told me that she had slept at Raffaele’s house and that when she had gone back to our house she had found the door open and blood in her bathroom. She told me that she’d had a shower, that she was scared and that she was going to call Raffaele Sollecito. It seemed really strange to me and I asked her to check that the house was in order and to call the police or Carabinieri.” (Michael: “Going to call” RS when AK and RS claim they came back to the cottage together at 1130?)
1235 - 1245 Second phone conversation between AK and FR
1245 Third phone conversation between AK and FR “she told me that the window in my room was broken and that my room was in a mess. At this point I asked her to call the police and she told me that she already had.”
1250 RS calls his sister in the Carabinieri
1251 RS phones the Carabinieri (for the first time)
1254 RS phones the Carabinieri again
1300 (just before) Filomena Romanelli arrives at apartment with her friends PA (Paola Grande - girlfriend of Luca) and LA (Luca Altieri). M (Marco) was present and “Amanda and Raffaele were in Amanda’s room because at a certain point they came out into the corridor and we introduced ourselves.” (Michael: Evidently, RS and AK failed to notice Meredith’s keys whilst they were hidden away in her room. Why were they in AK’s room when important actions were taking place elsewhere in the cottage, leaving non-resident Marco to deal with the Postal Police? How long were they in there for? ‘What’ were they doing whilst in there - checking it was ‘clean’?)
1305 Postal Police arrive (per RS and his lawyers)
1315 (circa) After listening to Filomena’s remarks, with Postal Police present, LA breaks down door of MK’s room
Evening PG and LA take RS and AK to Perugia police station in their car. PG and LA have stated that during the trip RS was constantly asking them questions regarding the murder and investigation of a manner that caused them to become so concerned and suspicious, they thorougly checked over the interior of the car after RS and AK got out, for ‘incriminating evidence’ they were afraid the pair may have ‘planted’ there. The ‘suspicious’ behaviour of the couple continued inside the police station, which was noted and reported by multiple witnesses
**These times must be very approximate since the 20:40 time slot is ‘very’ congested.
Friday, December 05, 2008
Formal Kercher Request That Trial Be Behind Closed Doors
Posted by Peter Quennell
The Kercher family have now formally filed the request that the trial of Knox and Sollecito be held behind closed doors.
The Kerchers’ request was filed by their extremely capable court-appointed lawyer, Francesco Maresca, with the Court of Assizes in Perugia.
The Court will announce its decision on this at the first, public, session of the Knox/Sollecito trial on 16 January.
The trial of Rudy Guede - which was also behind closed doors - largely hinged on evidence from Meredith’s bedroom and from her autopsy.
That evidence was said to have been extremely disturbing to many inside the court-room, and resulted in Guede’s very stiff 30-year sentence.
If the evidence not yet in the public domain really is as sickening as is rumored, it is hard to see the defense teams resisting the request.
And the Italian system hardly needs to prove publicly its extreme caution, carefulness, and fairness. Despite some absurd claims to the contrary.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
So The Trial Date IS Postponed, Now It’s 16 January
Posted by Peter Quennell
This is a translation of the report from La Stampa.
Meredith process, hearing postponed
Amanda and Raffaele have to answer to the charge of murder
The case against Amanda and Raffaele is postponed to allow for the reading of additional investigations carried out by the Public Prosecutor
Postponed to January 16, 2009, is the hearing for the murder of Meredith Kercher, which initiates the trialproceedings against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, who are accused of murder in the taunting and violence against American student (Rudy Guede has already been sentenced to 30 years jis trial having been expedited, ed.)
The presiding judge, Giancarlo Massei, deferred the opening session to enable the parties to get to know the contents of the additional investigations carried out by the prosecutor of Perugia. Tomorrow is the deadline for the submission of lists and texts that will amount to a total of about a hundred.
And a brief summary of some of the other recent developments in the case….
- A witness who knew her claims to have seen Amanda Knox in a supermarket early on the day after the crime
- A second witness claims to have heard a scream on the evening of the crime, this one stating a precise time
- A witness claims to have seen Knox, Sollecito and Guede together previously - if so, they did know one another
- A cut was apparently seen on Knox’s neck by another house resident; autopsy and scenario are being reviewed
- A fund-raising event in Seattle apparently raised $11,000 to help defray Knox’s parents’ defense and travel costs
- And a Kercher family request for a closed-door trial - permitted in Italy for sex crimes - is now being reviewed
One of the great areas of conjecture is whether the alleged defendants actually pre-planned an assault on Meredith. Or whether it was perhaps just a taunt, one that took on a deadly spiral.
There was an apparent simultaneous switching-off of their mobiles earlier in the evening, for a reason not so far explained. And now an apparent prior three-way relationship between the two charged and the one sentenced? This does not look good.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Hoax: Huge Problem With “There Is No Evidence”
Posted by Peter Quennell
Startling new evidence…
Today reports are surfacing in Italy that a witness (one of the hidden 100) seems to have seen Amanda Knox in this Conad supermarket (lower right and below) at 7:45 on the morning after the crime.
Knox apparently claimed she was asleep in Sollecito’s apartment to around 10:00 am.
This supermarket (right above) is maybe 50 meters from the School for Foreigners (ahead above). About 600 meters from Raffaele Solecito’s apartment (behind above). And about 300 meters from Meredith’s house (left above).
It sells, among other things, laundry detergent (laundry of Meredith’s clothes may have been happening when the cops arrived) and bleach (the place might have been bleached to hide evidence).
Amanda Knox may have been seen in that detergent and bleach area, by someone who knows her, and then seen exiting in the direction of her house - Meredith’s house.
New evidence should really not come as much of a surprise.
Despite claims to the contrary - that it has all been leaked, and found wanting - the evidence in this case is actually more like an iceberg.
Eighty-plus percent of it is still out of sight. Little of what is in those 10,000 pages of sealed evidence, added to daily by new witnesses, is known to outsiders.
Much of what we HAVE seen of it hangs true.
And those few who are insiders seem to get noticeably more quiet and cautious when they do see it. Rudy Guede’s lawyers were bullish about his prospects - until they saw it.
And then Rudy Guede got handed 30 years.
The defendants really deserve a GOOD defense. By their lawyers. And hopefully, at long last, by their friends.
Sliming Italy and the players in the case looks like a slow-motion train-wreck to us. Available evidence deserves to be gone over without reflexive shoot-from-the-hip dismissal.
So. No evidence? Perhaps that mantra should now be laid to rest. It’s increasingly looking to be flat-out wrong.
And a quick shortcut to a life behind bars.
Friday, November 14, 2008
La Nazione Is Reporting There Will Be Nearly 100 Witnesses
Posted by Peter Quennell
Including a possible three new eye-witnesses in the vicinity of the house on the night in question.
And that the lawyer for the Kercher family, Mr Maresca, says they would prefer no TV cameras in the courtroom.
English translation here if and when we get one. But that is the main news in the piece.