Thursday, June 06, 2013

Two Misleading Reviews Of Knox’s “Waiting To Be Heard” In The New York Times

Posted by Peter Quennell

DRAFT

The Two NY Times Reviews

Neither of these reviews informed readers that there were approximately 500 misleading statements in the book.

1. From Sam Tanenhaus’s review “Trial & Error”

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/26/books/review/trial-and-error.html

2. From Michiko Kakutani’s review “Tales From the Prison of International Notoriety”

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/22/books/amanda-knoxs-memoir-waiting-to-be-heard.html

 

Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/06/13 at 08:00 AM in

Comments

No comments yet. Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Where next:

Click here to return to The Top Of The Front Page

Or to next entry Questions For Sollecito: Can You Realistically Account For The Bathroom Mat Evidence?

Or to previous entry Updating Our Scenarios And Timelines #1: The Timing Of RS Phone Events By Coordinated Universal Time