Thursday, June 20, 2019
Knox’s Modena Catastrophe: Explaining Some Major Threats That Knox’s Foolish Rant Has Fired Up
Posted by KrissyG
Sarcastic graphic; Italian media is now negative toward Knox
Long Post. Click here to go straight to Comments
1. How Knox “Onshored” The PR’s Greatest Lies
David Marriott must be rolling over in his grave.
Remember what we said about his barbaric “public relations” in Post #1 below?
This case is riddled with dogs-that-didnt-bark examples. It was the core modus operandi of the scorched-earth public relations campaign run by Curt Knox and David Marriott. Ignore the damning 95 percent of the facts that can’t easily be explained away. Instead concentrate on misrepresenting the other 5 percent.
Given what we explained about live TV and documents in the first part, this would not have worked at all in Italy.
But it was never meant to. It was not beamed at Italy - it was beamed at British and Americans who (1) could not observe Knox for days and days on TV and (2) could not read court documents readily available online in Italian. Then hopefully they would react politically, as in the US they did of course.
So to Marriott it was vital to success that the PR’s myriad lies and defamations beamed at Americans and Brits REMAIN OFFSHORE!
The last thing Knox or anyone was meant to do was go half way round the world to Italy and ONSHORE the attacks.
But this is what Knox just did.
And she attacked two of Italy’s most liked and trusted institutions: (1) the world-class law-enforcement and justice system, and (2) the mostly restrained, quite elegant media.
Why Knox did this is not (or not only) the me-me-me obsession of a pathological narcissist at work. We’ll explain why in Post #3.
Here we explain which major risks for herself Knox may have set in motion, which to any smart mind would say at minimum “Imperious trips to Italy are at an end.”
2. Ten Of The Many Threats Knox May Have Fired Up
1. Guede Could Rebut Her All Over Italian Media
Guede is due to be released any day now. He will be free to give interviews, write his memoirs, point the finger at Sollecito or (more likely now) Knox. Knox obviously will not be in Italy and unable to respond.
In his televised interview with RAI in April 2017 and described by the DAILY BEAST as presenting himself as ‘extremely cultured if not intellectual’ he:
“[Guede] maintained his innocence, pointed the finger at Seattle native Amanda Knox, and refused to name her Italian boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito.”
This could be read as either he didn’t know or recognise Sollecito well enough to name him; or that as a captive prisoner he was afraid of retribution by Sollecito’s unsavory clan.
In his description of the ‘man in the doorway’ of Meredith’s room as of the time of his arrest he claims the hall light had been switched off and the intruder’s face was backlit (in other words in the dark), but that he had light brown hair, was shorter than him and spoke native fluent Italian.
In addition, he wore a Napapirri type jacket, a white beanie, with a red band, and held a stiletto blade in his left hand.
This would certainly count out an Albanian as suggested by Sollecito’s star witness Alessi whom nobody took seriously, anyway.
However, Knox does give Alessi great credence, at p 418, Waiting to be Heard speculating that she wondered who Guede’s friend was in Alessi’s version of events, which involved a graphic threesome.
In WTBH p 220 Knox claims when she saw Guede’s photo on tv for the first time after he was arrested she thought, ‘Oh my God, it’s him.’ She goes on to claim this was the guy she was referring to when she told police of a South African ’who played basketball with the guys downstairs’.
She claims she had only seen him one time after that, at Le Chic when she had ‘taken his drink order’. She omits to mention joining him for a joint with the guys in the downstairs house.
Guede himself claims he referred to himself as South African when chatting to Meredith during the England vs South Africa rugby cup final.
So, how did Knox ‘know’ he was ‘South African’ if she had never spoken to him, bearing in mind South Africans in Europe aren’t generally assumed to be black?
Guede, in his Prison Diary, claimed there had been a spark between him and Knox when they were smoking a joint (there are solid witnesses to the fact this gathering did take place).
Given Knox’s multiple falsely claims in her book WTBH, which she would have had a chance to review and edit, that she only met Guede ‘vaguely’ twice and we know that to be factually untrue. We have to suspect that actually she did know him as an acquaintance at least.
With Sollecito and Knox both ganging up on Guede, not to mention the widespread PR naming him as the ‘local burglar’ who left his DNA ‘all over the murder scene’, we can expect Guede to be keen to set the story straight from his POV once he is released.
2. Police Forensic Scientists Knox PR Abused
They know objective scientific tests do not lie: they know what the luminol, shoeprints and DNA means.
According to Nick Richardson of the London Review Of Books (LROB) in an excellent review of WTBH which I shall quote a lot (there are also numerous posts on TJMK which correspond):
“The Esperti Ricerca Tracce – the state police’s crime scene investigation unit – found bloody shoe prints and a handprint on a pillow that had been placed under Kercher’s hips.
On the sheet on her bed they found the outline of a knife.
One of the ERT’s scientists, Patrizia Stefanoni, examined Kercher’s vagina and found a long blonde hair.
They swabbed the bathroom, sprayed the apartment with luminol, a chemical used to reveal traces of blood that has been wiped away, and found footprints the size of Knox’s and Sollecito’s feet in the corridor outside Kercher’s room.
Also a drop of blood in Romanelli’s room that was later shown, as was the blood on the tap, to contain both Knox’s and Kercher’s DNA.”
The invisible bloody footprint directly facing Meredith’s door has been identified by forensic experts as Sollecito’s.
Add to the mixes of Knox’s and Meredith’s blood and/or DNA in the bathroom sink, bidet, cotton bud box and light switch, it is hardly accurate to say ‘there is no sign of Knox (or Sollecito) at the crime scene’, especially if one considers that the footprint/shoeprint expert further positively identified a ladies size 37 trainer shoe print underneath the body.
There was also shards of glass trailed in from Filomena’s room, where there is no sign of Guede at all, bearing in mind he is supposed to be the burglar who entered that way.
A quote from LROB:
The investigators never believed that Guede was Kercher’s sole killer. The state autopsy results suggested that there had been more than one assailant.
She had dozens of cuts and bruises: finger bruises round her neck, a bruise on her chin and over her mouth, identical bruises on her inner elbows compatible with her being held back.
It would have been extremely difficult to pin her down and inflict so much damage without being wounded too, especially as Kercher practised karate – but Guede only had the cuts on his hand.
Plus there were the bloody footprints shown up by the luminol and the mixed-DNA bloodstains in Romanelli’s room and the bathroom.
At Guede’s trial Judge Micheli declared that he believed Guede had acted with Knox and Sollecito.
His confidence was shored up by two pieces of DNA evidence that the prosecution would rely on heavily in court.
In November 2007 investigators found a knife at Sollecito’s apartment with Knox’s DNA on the handle and Kercher’s on the blade.’
3. Police Telecomms Experts The PR Abused
technical forensic experts: they know the truth about Sollecito’s claim he didn’t turn off his phone, he just didn’t have a signal.
Sollecito’s phone providers gave the forensic communications technicians clear evidence there had not been anything wrong with the phone signals hat night, nor were the walls ‘too thick’ and nor was Raff’s apartment in a blind area for signals.
Residents in the neighbouring apartments and buildings experienced no problems with their phone signals.
Yet Sollecito denies he switched off his phone just before 21:00.
So the communications guys know for definite Knox and Sollecito both switched off their phones within minutes of each other, between 20:45 and 21:00.
After 21:20 there is no further recorded electronic activity in the flat for the rest of the night.
4. Police Telecomms Experts The PR Abused (2)
They know the truth about the trashed laptops.
Sollecito and Knox’ lawyers claim his was fried by the police via the wrong current plugged in.
Notwithstanding power portals are designed to only allow fit of the right size cable, this argument doesn’t work because it was only the cottage laptops that ‘fried’, and not Patrick Lumumba’s, which was tested at the same time.
CDV: Are you aware of the possibility of an electric shock?
MG: We are aware of the possibility of an electric shock [power surge], I can not exclude it with certainty, but at the same time the fact that it has worked in other hard disks always with the same instrument, always in that same place connected to the same electric network, is however an indicator that it cannot be that in one moment it worked and in another, not.’
‘CDV: However, are you aware that there is a different voltage between a portable PC and a desktop?
MG: Yes.’
In other words, the laptops were fried before the police sequestered them.
Filomena Romanelli rescued her laptop at the scene. When she attended the Questura the next day to hand it in, it would not start.
Sure proof together with the dead laptops of Knox, Kercher and Sollecito that it was not the police who ‘fried’ them.
Sollecito claims in Honor Bound that his laptop was damaged by the police pulling the socket out of the wall before logging out.
Non-IT folk might be dumb, but not so dumb to believe it is a coincidence that all four laptops were kaput, whereas Patrick’s was not, and which was never anywhere near IT-boffin Sollecito, and all tested by the police at the same time.
5. Investigators Can Prove Knox Was Not Abused
The police know the truth about Knox’ claims of having been unethically treated. Knox claims in WTBH according to the LROB:
“ They gave her a confession to sign. It said that she’d met up with Lumumba after leaving Sollecito’s flat at 8.30 p.m. and that they’d gone to the villa together; that Patrick had had sex with Meredith; and that she remembered ‘confusedly’ – confusedly because she’d earlier smoked a joint with Sollecito – that he killed her.
Once she’d signed it, Knox says, the police officers ‘whooped and high-fived each other’.
The public prosecutor later bullied her into making a second ‘spontaneous declaration’ in which she added that she had been in the kitchen when the murder took place, and that ‘at one point I heard Meredith screaming and I was scared and covered my ears.’
A classic case of ‘shoot the messenger’. It was Mignini what done it, according to Knox (see Point 10 below) as he made her blurt this out by some kind of special psychic power.
We proved this was not so.
6. Prison Officers Abused By PR Know Prison Truths
They know the truth about Knox’ claims of being suicidal in prison: by all accounts she fit in well and was as happy as a lark, performing, writing stories and scripting videos.
In her application to the ECHR, Knox claims she was tricked into revealing her list of sexual partners, which she listed in her Prison Diary and which was then leaked to the press.
We proved this was not so. Also the ECHR recently did not find Knox had been mistreated by the prison doctors or staff, nor was she abused by the police as she claims.
Fact is, Knox won a prize for essay writing (about a man at a party who finds his half-naked girlfriend lying on the floor at a party with stab wounds [‘piercings’]) and scripting a video featuring a young girl strapped to a chair being tortured by three people including Knox as the star character and the three seen running down a stairwell fleeing.
The Knox character is pictured in prison writing at a table and in the next she is seen raving at a prison party waving her arms in the air.
The message does not escape anybody. There are photos of her just like that.
7. What The Judges The PR Abused Saw
Some thirty-five to forty judges - both presiding or as in a jurors’ panel - all could not help but conclude the pair were guilty as charged (Marasca-Bruno never had the pair before them)
Whilst the criminal courts were dealing in criminal law:
“Meanwhile, Knox’s mother was appearing regularly on American TV shows, proclaiming her daughter’s innocence over home video footage of Knox as a child.
A Seattle-based group called Friends of Amanda was formed by Anne Bremner, a criminal lawyer who set herself up as a spokesperson for the Knox family.
The Knoxes also hired a PR guru called David Marriott to prepare press releases for the American media.
An American author called Douglas Preston, who had written a book about the serial killer known as the Monster of Florence – a case that had also been investigated by Justice Mignini, the chief prosecutor in Knox and Sollecito’s trial – discovered that Mignini had once wire-tapped a journalist.
This served to back up the Knox camp’s claim that improper interrogation techniques had been used (even though Mignini had hardly been present at the interrogation).
It also came out that when Mignini was investigating the Monster of Florence case he had called in a ‘witch’ to advise him on satanism.”
LROB
In other words, there was a concerted US campaign to outwit the courts, battling a ‘persuasion techniques’ advertising campaign, their motto being, ‘attack is the best form of defence’, trying to dig up the dirt on the Italian Roman Catholic prosecutor with his ‘medieval religious beliefs’ whilst exaggerating Knox as Miss American Pie.
On their side was journalist and failing crime novelist Douglas Preston, with a score to settle against Italy and Mignini, having been forced to get out of the country or face prosecution for trying to pervert the course of justice in the MOF case.
‘The American novelist Nathaniel Rich wrote a long piece for Rolling Stone in June 2011 entitled: ‘The Never-Ending Nightmare of Amanda Knox’. [See our post here.]
It opened with a gory re-enactment of Kercher’s murder: ‘On the third try, the killer found a soft spot …’ The killer; one killer.’
LROB
We know that Nathaniel Rich was fed this story by Knox’s best friend of the time, Madison Paxton, on whom he had a crush.
Paxton was busy sending out PR and writing her own copy starting off the popular story ‘Knox was railroaded by the police’.
It was Nina Burleigh who started the ‘Guede was a drifter’ meme.
Whilst the PR has been very successful in the USA, the UK and Italian press focused more on the facts of the trial, with libel laws being much stricter and reporting standards high, although they nearly all describe Guede as the ‘drifter’
‘Rich followed his piece with a review of Waiting to Be Heard in the New York Review in which not only are the Italian police bungling idiots, the Italian journalists immoral dogs, the Italian legal professionals superstitious fools, but Perugia itself is portrayed as a vortex of evil and chicanery’
LROB
‘The managers of Knox’s downfall came in for savage caricature, though they were respected professionals with long careers behind them: Mignini was a senile fuddy-duddy, Napoleoni a vindictive bully; Stefanoni incompetent, though she was an internationally reputed forensics expert who had been entrusted with the identification of bodies after the 2004 tsunami.
[Senator] Cantwell stated that she had ‘serious questions about the Italian justice system’; the state for which she is senator, Washington, currently has eight people on death row.
In The Fatal Gift of Beauty, Burleigh, one of the most vocal Italy-haters, wrote that at the trial Knox’s family radiated ‘that quality that so differentiates the American from the European – enthusiasm’. ‘
LROB
The PR which Knox touts to this day makes out Knox to be the victim of a sexist salacious press determined to paint her as the drug-taking ‘slut’ and this is the story-telling Knox took to Modena.
No questions are allowed of her ever about the evidence at the trial itself.
8. What DNA Expert Dr Francesco Vinci Saw In The DNA
Dr Vinci saw data that made him back off the case. Vinci was one of the defence forensic DNA experts.
He discovered DNA fragments of both Knox and Guede on Meredith’s bra fabric. These, however, were below the legal standard of needing at least ten alleles.
He walked off the case or was pushed, nonetheless.
What does Vinci know that made him no longer able to continue defending the pair on the DNA?
9. What Goods Sollecito Has On Knox (A Lot)
‘A short story by Knox surfaced, in which one of the male characters tells his friend: ‘A thing you have to know about chicks is that they don’t know what they want … You have to show it to them.’ This was taken by the colpevolisti as evidence that she had fantasised about rape.
In another story fragment that Knox posted on her Myspace page a couple of weeks before the murder the narrator has an obsessive crush on her female housemate.
Sollecito, the son of a wealthy Pugliese doctor, also had his character picked over.
He’d been into drugs when he was younger, and still smoked copious amounts of hash: in one post on a social networking site he bragged about spending ‘80 per cent of my waking hours high’.
He was a porn addict, and owned a collection of swords and knives. He liked vampire comics. He had written on his blog that he craved ‘new sensations’.
Perhaps the most damaging thing to turn up was a picture he once posted of himself wearing surgical bandages and posing with a meat cleaver and a jug of cleaning fluid.’
LROB
So, the American PR campaign that ensured Guede was constantly referred to as a ‘drifter’, ‘petty thief’, burglar’ and ‘drug dealer’ didn’t translate into Knox or Sollecito being similarly branded.
This was despite Knox getting a police caution and fine for riotous behavior at a party and Sollecito likewise in possession of drugs, both before the Kercher murder.
Guede was just as middle-class as either of them and had no police record at all.
The PR relies on racist stereotyping based on the US version of the ‘poor unemployable Black on welfare and in and out of prison’.
‘Sollecito told the police that she had left him in town, saying she was going to meet friends at Le Chic at 9 p.m., and he had gone home alone and surfed the internet until she came back at one.
(In Honour Bound, Sollecito’s new book, he says he was so stoned that he can’t be sure Knox didn’t leave him alone for some time that night.1) Computer experts who testified at the trial said that Sollecito’s laptop had not been used between 9.30 p.m. and 5.30 a.m. on the morning after the murder.
Knox and Sollecito said that they had slept in on the morning of 2 November, but phone records showed that they had both switched their mobiles on at six, having turned them off for the night.’
LROB
Forensic IT experts very clearly testified that there had been no computer activity on Sollecito’s laptop after 21:20, when the film Amelie finished until next day.
This was backed up by unequivocal data from Raff’s IT provider.
Sollecito in effect like Baby Jane knows ‘secrets about you’.
10. What Mignini knows but hasn’t revealed.
Dr Mignini has an enormous choice of means to clear his name and punish Knox and the mafia poodles when he takes retirement early next year.
He will really be liberated then and he does excellent speeches and TV. He will be in enormous demand for sure. He will come to the United States.
Our Italian lawyers tell us this malicious invention below in Knox’s 2013 book WTBH is diffamazione (criminal slander) for sure.
Knox was clearly trying to end Dr Mignini’s career, and see him sent to prison as well. The statute of limitations on this has years to go before it tuns out.
In other words he CAN sue in Italy and the UK and maybe even the US.
Amazingly, it is very much along the lines of the calunnia against Patrick Lumumba for which Knox served three years and it was without any provocation or pressure at all, as she was sitting in Seattle when she wrote her book.
The big problem for Knox? When this lurid claim of an illegal interrogation took place Dr Mignini was not even there.
He was asleep in bed.
[From pages 90-92 of the weirdly titled “Waiting To Be Heard”. The date is 7 November 2007. This is the 1.45 am session with Rita Ficarra which in fact was devoted merely to building a list of visitors to the house.]
Eventually they told me the pubblico ministero [prosecutor] would be coming in.
I didn’t know this translated as prosecutor, or that this was the magistrate that Rita Ficarra had been referring to a few days earlier when she said they’d have to wait to see what he said, to see if I could go to Germany.
I thought the “public minister” was the mayor or someone in a similarly high “public” position in the town and that somehow he would help me.
[One of numerous lies in the book. Knox had been with Dr Mignini three times already: on the morning after Meredith was killed and when he twice took her back to her house.]
They said, “You need to talk to the pubblico ministero about what you remember.”
I told them, “I don’t feel like this is remembering. I’m really confused right now.” I even told them, “I don’t remember this. I can imagine this happening, and I’m not sure if it’s a memory or if I’m making this up, but this is what’s coming to mind and I don’t know. I just don’t know.”
They said, “Your memories will come back. It’s the truth. Just wait and your memories will come back.”
The pubblico ministero [Dr Mignini] came in.
Before he started questioning me, I said, “Look, I’m really confused, and I don’t know what I’m remembering, and it doesn’t seem right.”
One of the other police officers said, “We’ll work through it.”
Despite the emotional sieve I’d just been squeezed through, it occurred to me that I was a witness and this was official testimony, that maybe I should have a lawyer. “Do I need a lawyer?” I asked.
He said, “No, no, that will only make it worse. It will make it seem like you don’t want to help us.”
It was a much more solemn, official affair than my earlier questioning had been, though the pubblico ministero was asking me the same questions as before: “What happened? What did you see?”
I said, “I didn’t see anything.”
“What do you mean you didn’t see anything? When did you meet him?”
“I don’t know,” I said.
“Where did you meet him?”
“I think by the basketball court.” I had imagined the basketball court in Piazza Grimana, just across the street from the University for Foreigners.
“I have an image of the basketball court in Piazza Grimana near my house.”
“What was he wearing?”
“I don’t know.”
“Was he wearing a jacket?”
“I think so.”
“What color was it?”
“I think it was brown.”
“What did he do?”
“I don’t know.”
“What do you mean you don’t know?”
“I’m confused!”
“Are you scared of him?”
“I guess.”I felt as if I were almost in a trance. The pubblico ministero led me through the scenario, and I meekly agreed to his suggestions.
“This is what happened, right? You met him?”
“I guess so.”
“Where did you meet?”
“I don’t know. I guess at the basketball court.”
“You went to the house?”
“I guess so.”
“Was Meredith in the house?”
“I don’t remember.”
“Did Patrick go in there?”
“I don’t know, I guess so.”
“Where were you?”
“I don’t know. I guess in the kitchen.”
“Did you hear Meredith screaming?”
“I don’t know.”
“How could you not hear Meredith screaming?”
“I don’t know. Maybe I covered my ears. I don’t know, I don’t know if I’m just imagining this. I’m trying to remember, and you’re telling me I need to remember, but I don’t know. This doesn’t feel right.”
He said, “No, remember. Remember what happened.”
“I don’t know.”At that moment, with the pubblico ministero raining questions down on me, I covered my ears so I could drown him out.
He said, “Did you hear her scream?”
I said, “I think so.”My account was written up in Italian and he said, “This is what we wrote down. Sign it.”
Posted by KrissyG on 06/20/19 at 09:17 PM in
Comments
What a hornet’s nest.
If her ONE assigned job, a very lucrative one, was to trash Italian justice globally from a distance, would it not make sense that she was instructed to REMAIN at a distance?
If Knox disappears, or goes on the run soon, that should answer this question. Should we be alerting the authorities? Hmmm… they do all know, of course.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/22/19 at 08:26 AM | #
Marriott must be rolling over in his grave, ha ha ha!! What a monster, how he bribed and bullied reporters was on a whole new depraved plane. A UK paper did an expose of several pages - it was taken down within hours. Knox is absolutely rudderless without him. He was proud of never going to Italy and never reading up on the case.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/22/19 at 09:21 AM | #
This quick report on Knox in Modena and Sollecito on Porta-a-Porta from Machiavelli shows how rudderless both have become.
Bear in mind the weekly Porta-a-Porta has a huge national audience, at least as big proportionally as CBS’s “60 Minutes” in the US (is there a BBC equivalent?).
So the ridicule of Knox in the report shown before-hand would reach like 100 times the audience of her talk put on YouTube. She really took a hit here.
Sollecito said some things of limited interested on Porta a Porta, he came across as a semi-idiot with a passive-agressive attitude imho, whereas the person who appeared far more credible among the guests was magistrate Simonetta Matone.
Sollecito said some false things about Anna Donnino. I didn’t note much else relevant.What I found delightful was rather the clip reporting about Knox in Modena that was aired before the Porta a Porta studio talk. The video noted how Knox was pretending to cry like a bad actress, and how the conference was organized in such a way to avoid any discussion and any challenge to Knox’s version. The report was definitely sarcastic and abrasive.
But the show was anyway mostly against Knox rather than against Sollecito.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/22/19 at 10:10 AM | #
KrissyG Point 1: Guede Could Rebut Her All Over Italian Media
KrissyG’s first danger for Knox refers to Guede’s nationally televised interview in 2016.
Eric Parossien very kindly subtitled (a lon g loong job) and posted the entire interview.
Another post in this same series will explain why Knox was dumb as a rock to blame only him.
In her list-building session with Rita Ficarra Knox referred to a South African.
I presumed she didnt want to point too precisly to Guede but I like this reasoning which I’d not known about.
http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php/tjmk/comments/the_knox_interrogation_hoax_12_proof_released
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/22/19 at 10:35 AM | #
KrissyG Point 2: Police Forensic Scientists Knox PR Abused
KrissyG’s second danger for Knox is on the DNA. We have had so many long posts on this, many brilliant, and not one of the mafia poodles has ever come close to rebutting all of them in a single article.
KrissyG posted this, our moist recent comprehensive overview with some illustrations.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/22/19 at 02:25 PM | #
KrissyG Point 5. Investigators Can Prove Knox Was Not Abused
Really?! Anyone NEEDS to do this? Knox STILL claims she was? After all these years and massive disproof?
Is the bloodmoney just too great? Note ow many Knox claims would simply break the law here. She would be nailed by a judge.
Under relentless cross-examination, Knox said ON THE STAND in July 2009 that she was NOT abused and treated well.
She fingered poor Patrick all by herself. That is why she rightly served three years, and is a felon for life.
Note that the Modena crowd was NOT TOLD KNOX IS A FELON FOR LIFE!!!
In her “appeal” to ECHR Strasbourg the ECHR judges recently ruled she was not abused, she had zero grounds.
http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php/tjmk/comments/how_knoxs_ill-advised_echr_complaint
HER OWN LAWYERS asked her publicly not to keep telling that lie as all private advice (as always) fell on deaf ears.
http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php/tjmk/comments/is_the_amanda_knox_defense_team_being_undermined
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/23/19 at 02:11 PM | #
KrissyG Point 6. Prison Officers Abused By PR Know Prison Truths
Check out some our posts on Knox in Capanne. There are many images of her having a good time. Had she stayed long enough chances are good she would have mentally come right (and really confessed).
http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php/tjmk/comments/lifetime_movie_included_a_serious_wrong_charge
http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php/tjmk/comments/the_hands_of_time_video_with_screenplay_by_amanda_knox_-_a_confessiona
\
http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php/tjmk/comments/demonizations_byKnox_book_claims_about_prison_traumas
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/24/19 at 09:52 AM | #
KrissyG Point 7. What The Judges The PR Abused Saw
The families and their lawyers managed to find four BENT judges (Hellman, Marasca & Bruno, Boninsegna).
But they never found even one who warmed to the pair.
Almost always THE JUDGES WERE HARDER-LINE THAN PROSECUTORS.
And the JUDGES like eg Matteini controlled the process the entire way through, quite unlike what we see in the US.
You didnt hear that from the PR?! How odd.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/24/19 at 09:59 AM | #
KrissyG Point 8: What DNA Expert Dr Francesco Vinci Saw In The DNA
Yes Professor Vinci WAS an odd case!! Too honest and objective for his own good.
He DID walk or get squeezed out of the DNA team. He was meant to point away from RS but didn’t, he stated cold hard facts.
Hard to believe: he was brought back, to rebut RS’s bloody footprint on the bathmat - and again he got out of line.
In his huge report, his measurements were shown to be wrong (deliberately?), and again did Sollecito no good.
Yes he’d be good, pro-truth.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/24/19 at 10:26 AM | #
KrissyG Point 9: What Goods Sollecito Has On Knox (A Lot)
Yeah, well, what can we add! Only that he may be blackmsiling her now. If the &&& dry up he may tell.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/24/19 at 10:28 AM | #
KrissyG Point 10: What Mignini knows but hasn’t revealed
A post in this series will be just on him. He knows how 3 trials were bent. he knows about Knox heavily on drugs. He knows about the Sollecito clan.
He has a book almost ready to go, and will lecture in Italy and the US next year.
Posted by Peter Quennell on 06/24/19 at 10:32 AM | #
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Where next:
Click here to return to The Top Of The Front PageOr to next entry Wedding Of The Ghouls
Or to previous entry The World Isnt Short Of Suckers - Lupária, Sola & Cagossi Present “The Traveling Innocence Gang Show”